Literature DB >> 24022757

Clinical significance of increased tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.

Giselle A Baquero, Pradeep Yadav, Joshua B Skibba, Javier E Banchs, Latoya N Linton-Frazier, Eugene J Lengerich, Soraya M Samii, Erica Penny-Peterson, Deborah L Wolbrette, Jerry C Luck, Gerald V Naccarelli, Mario D Gonzalez.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiac rhythm management devices (CRMD) require a ventricular lead to be placed across the tricuspid valve. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is an under-recognized clinical complication of lead implantation and its clinical significance is unknown. We studied the incidence of hospitalizations for congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation among patients with worsening TR after ventricular lead implantation.
METHODS: We reviewed 148 patients (age 68 ± 15) that received a CRMD. TR and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) measured by Doppler echocardiography before and after CRMD implantation were analyzed. Hospitalizations for CHF exacerbation post-implantation were counted.
RESULTS: Follow-up was 32 ± 14 months. Ninety-nine (67%) patients had no change, 24 (16%) slight, and 9 (6%) significant increase in TR after CRMD implantation, while 13 (9%) patients had slight and 3 (2%) significant improvement. Patients with a significant increase in TR had higher incidence of hospitalizations (1.7 ± 0.5) compared to patients with slight (0.8 ± 1; p = 0.006) or no increase (0.5 ± 1; p = 0.0002) in TR. Patients with significant increase in TR had a greater change in PASP (25 mmHg; p = 0.002) after device implantation compared to those with a slight (10 mmHg; p = 0.002) or no increase (0.7 mmHg; p = 0.17).
CONCLUSION: Increased TR following CRMD implantation is relatively common (33%) and correlated with subsequent risk of hospitalization for heart failure. A preventive strategy and close monitoring for development or worsening of CHF after CRMD implantation may help prevent hospital admissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24022757     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-013-9826-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  11 in total

1.  Transvenous pacemaker leads do not worsen tricuspid regurgitation: a prospective echocardiographic study.

Authors:  D W Leibowitz; S Rosenheck; A Pollak; M Geist; D Gilon
Journal:  Cardiology       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.869

2.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  William A Zoghbi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Elyse Foster; Paul A Grayburn; Carol D Kraft; Robert A Levine; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Catherine M Otto; Miguel A Quinones; Harry Rakowski; William J Stewart; Alan Waggoner; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  Increased prevalence of significant tricuspid regurgitation in patients with transvenous pacemakers leads.

Authors:  D Paniagua; H R Aldrich; E H Lieberman; G A Lamas; A S Agatston
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Right ventricular pacing increases tricuspid regurgitation grade regardless of the mechanical interference to the valve by the electrode.

Authors:  Mordehay Vaturi; Jairo Kusniec; Yaron Shapira; Roman Nevzorov; Idit Yedidya; Daniel Weisenberg; Daniel Monakier; Boris Strasberg; Alexander Sagie
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-02-25

5.  Autopsy findings with permanent pervenous pacemakers.

Authors:  S J Robboy; J W Harthorne; R C Leinbach; C A Sanders; W G Austen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Severe symptomatic tricuspid valve regurgitation due to permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Grace Lin; Rick A Nishimura; Heidi M Connolly; Joseph A Dearani; Thoralf M Sundt; David L Hayes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Tricuspid insufficiency does not increase early after permanent implantation of pacemaker leads.

Authors:  Nezihi Kucukarslan; Ata Kirilmaz; Eralp Ulusoy; Mehmet Yokusoglu; Nikola Gramatnikovski; Ertugrul Ozal; Harun Tatar
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.620

8.  Impact of transvenous ventricular pacing leads on tricuspid regurgitation in pediatric and congenital heart disease patients.

Authors:  Gregory Webster; Renee Margossian; Mark E Alexander; Frank Cecchin; John K Triedman; Edward P Walsh; Charles I Berul
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  The effect of transvenous pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead placement on tricuspid valve function: an observational study.

Authors:  Juyong B Kim; Daniel M Spevack; Paul A Tunick; John R Bullinga; Itzhak Kronzon; Larry A Chinitz; Harmony R Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Tricuspid incompetence following permanent pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Marc Klutstein; Jonathan Balkin; Adi Butnaru; Michael Ilan; Amnon Lahad; David Rosenmann
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.976

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid valve incompetence following implantation of ventricular leads.

Authors:  Giselle A Baquero; Jerry Luck; Gerald V Naccarelli; Mario D Gonzalez; Javier E Banchs
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-04

2.  Radial Multi-Site, Longitudinal Multi-Polar Epicardial Left Ventricular Pacing In Tricuspid Valve Disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau; Tony McEntee; Kyle B Ashfield; Alastair N Graham
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2016-09

3.  Multi-site multi-polar left ventricular pacing through persistent left superior vena cava in tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Ernest W Lau
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-05-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.