Literature DB >> 16844745

Similarity and difference in the unfolding of thermophilic and mesophilic cold shock proteins studied by molecular dynamics simulations.

Xiaoqin Huang1, Huan-Xiang Zhou.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed to unfold a homologous pair of thermophilic and mesophilic cold shock proteins at high temperatures. The two proteins differ in just 11 of 66 residues and have very similar structures with a closed five-stranded antiparallel beta-barrel. A long flexible loop connects the N-terminal side of the barrel, formed by three strands (beta1-beta3), with the C-terminal side, formed by two strands (beta4-beta5). The two proteins were found to follow the same unfolding pathway, but with the thermophilic protein showing much slower unfolding. Unfolding started with the melting of C-terminal strands, leading to exposure of the hydrophobic core. Subsequent melting of beta3 and the beta-hairpin formed by the first two strands then resulted in unfolding of the whole protein. The slower unfolding of the thermophilic protein could be attributed to ion pair formation of Arg-3 with Glu-46, Glu-21, and the C-terminal. These ion pairs were also found to be important for the difference in folding stability between the pair of proteins. Thus electrostatic interactions appear to play similar roles in the difference in folding stability and kinetics between the pair of proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16844745      PMCID: PMC1562390          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  77 in total

1.  Electrostatic contributions to the stability of a thermophilic cold shock protein.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Feng Dong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent.

Authors:  Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-11-01

3.  Folding a protein in a computer: an atomic description of the folding/unfolding of protein A.

Authors:  Angel E García; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The importance of explicit chain representation in protein folding models: an examination of Ising-like models.

Authors:  John Karanicolas; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-11-15

5.  Unfolding of the cold shock protein studied with biased molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Giulia Morra; Milan Hodoscek; Ernst-Walter Knapp
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-11-15

6.  Folding rates and low-entropy-loss routes of two-state proteins.

Authors:  Thomas R Weikl; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  High-temperature solution NMR structure of TmCsp.

Authors:  Astrid Jung; Christian Bamann; Werner Kremer; Hans Robert Kalbitzer; Eike Brunner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Temperature dependence of the free energy landscape of the src-SH3 protein domain.

Authors:  Weihua Guo; Sotiria Lampoudi; Joan-Emma Shea
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

9.  Polymer models of protein stability, folding, and interactions.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-03-02       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Simulation of the folding equilibrium of alpha-helical peptides: a comparison of the generalized Born approximation with explicit solvent.

Authors:  Hugh Nymeyer; Angel E García
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  12 in total

1.  The folding transition-state ensemble of a four-helix bundle protein: helix propensity as a determinant and macromolecular crowding as a probe.

Authors:  Harianto Tjong; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Temperature dependence of the flexibility of thermophilic and mesophilic flavoenzymes of the nitroreductase fold.

Authors:  Eric D Merkley; William W Parson; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  Atomistic modeling of macromolecular crowding predicts modest increases in protein folding and binding stability.

Authors:  Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Is there an en route folding intermediate for Cold shock proteins?

Authors:  Lei Huang; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Using molecular dynamics to probe the structural basis for enhanced stability in thermal stable cytochromes P450.

Authors:  Yergalem T Meharenna; Thomas L Poulos
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Impacts of the charged residues mutation S48E/N62H on the thermostability and unfolding behavior of cold shock protein: insights from molecular dynamics simulation with Gō model.

Authors:  Ji-Guo Su; Xiao-Ming Han; Shu-Xin Zhao; Yan-Xue Hou; Xing-Yuan Li; Li-Sheng Qi; Ji-Hua Wang
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 7.  Electrostatic Interactions in Protein Structure, Folding, Binding, and Condensation.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Xiaodong Pang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Improving the thermal stability of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Hypocrea jecorina by directed evolution.

Authors:  Frits Goedegebuur; Lydia Dankmeyer; Peter Gualfetti; Saeid Karkehabadi; Henrik Hansson; Suvamay Jana; Vicky Huynh; Bradley R Kelemen; Paulien Kruithof; Edmund A Larenas; Pauline J M Teunissen; Jerry Ståhlberg; Christina M Payne; Colin Mitchinson; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics.

Authors:  G Schreiber; G Haran; H-X Zhou
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  How conformational flexibility stabilizes the hyperthermophilic elongation factor G-domain.

Authors:  Maria Kalimeri; Obaidur Rahaman; Simone Melchionna; Fabio Sterpone
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.