Literature DB >> 1684330

Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution.

J A Coyne1, S Aulard, A Berry.   

Abstract

In(2LR)PL is a large pericentric inversion polymorphic in populations of Drosophila melanogaster on two Indian Ocean islands. This polymorphism is puzzling: because crossing over in female heterokaryotypes produces inviable zygotes, such inversions are thought to be underdominant and should be quickly eliminated from populations. The observed fixation for such inversions among related species has led to the idea that genetic drift can cause chromosome evolution in opposition to natural selection. We found, however, that In(2LR)PL is not underdominant for fertility, as heterokaryotypic females produce perfectly viable eggs. Genetic analysis shows that the lack of underdominance results from the nearly complete absence of crossing over in the inverted region. This phenomenon is probably caused by mechanical and not genetic factors, because crossing over is not suppressed in In(2LR)PL homokaryotypes. Our observations do not support the idea that the fixation of pericentric inversions among closely related species implies the action of genetic drift overcoming strong natural selection in very small populations. If chromosome arrangements vary in their underdominance, it is those with the least disadvantage as heterozygotes, like In(2LR)PL, that will be polymorphic or fixed in natural populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1684330      PMCID: PMC1204747     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  Genetic and chromosomal variability in Drosophila.

Authors:  W S STONE
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1955

2.  Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions.

Authors:  R J Baker; J W Bickham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A positive correlation between crossing over within heterozygous pericentric inversions and reduced egg hatch of Drosophila females.

Authors:  P A Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Screening for x-ray-induced crossover suppressors in Drosophila melanogaster: prevalence and effectiveness of translocations.

Authors:  P A Roberts
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Meiosis in inversion heterozygotes in Chironomidae.

Authors:  J Martin
Journal:  Can J Genet Cytol       Date:  1967-03

6.  Chromosomal sites necessary for normal levels of meiotic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Evidence for and mapping of the sites.

Authors:  R S Hawley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman; T H Roderick; M T Davisson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Authors:  I F Greenbaum; M J Reed
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984

9.  Light microscopic observations on the behavior of silver-stained trivalents in pachytene cells of Sigmodon fulviventer (Rodentia, Muridae) heterozygous for centric fusion.

Authors:  F F Elder; S Pathak
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1980

10.  Fine structure and behaviour of a pericentric inversion in the sand rat, Psammomys obesus.

Authors:  T Ashley; M J Moses; A J Solari
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  16 in total

1.  Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species.

Authors:  M A Noor; K L Grams; L A Bertucci; J Reiland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Interspecific reproductive barriers in the tomato clade: opportunities to decipher mechanisms of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  Patricia A Bedinger; Roger T Chetelat; Bruce McClure; Leonie C Moyle; Jocelyn K C Rose; Stephen M Stack; Esther van der Knaap; You Soon Baek; Gloria Lopez-Casado; Paul A Covey; Aruna Kumar; Wentao Li; Reynaldo Nunez; Felipe Cruz-Garcia; Suzanne Royer
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2010-11-14

3.  Molecular analysis of recombination in a family with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and a large pericentric X chromosome inversion.

Authors:  V Shashi; W L Golden; P S Allinson; S H Blanton; C von Kap-Herr; T E Kelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Chromosomal evolution and speciation: a recombination-based approach.

Authors:  Kevin Livingstone; Loren Rieseberg
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation?

Authors:  Benjamin Charles Jackson
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes.

Authors:  A Navarro; E Betrán; A Barbadilla; A Ruiz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  General survey of hAT transposon superfamily with highlight on hobo element in Drosophila.

Authors:  Véronique Ladevèze; Nicole Chaminade; Françoise Lemeunier; Georges Periquet; Sylvie Aulard
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Coyne; W Meyers; A P Crittenden; P Sniegowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sequence differentiation associated with an inversion on the neo-X chromosome of Drosophila americana.

Authors:  Bryant F McAllister
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  How and why chromosome inversions evolve.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.