Literature DB >> 7075348

Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions.

M J Moses, P A Poorman, T H Roderick, M T Davisson.   

Abstract

Two paracentric inversions in the mouse, In (1) 1 Rk and In (2) 5 Rk, have been studied in surface microspreads of spermatocytes from heterozygotes. At zytogene, synaptic initiation occurs independently in three regions: within the inversion, and without, on either side. Synaptonemal complex (SC) formation is restricted to homologous regions, resulting in inversion loops in all early pachytene spermatocytes. An adjusting phase then occurs during pachytene in which the inversion loop is reduced by desynapsis of homologously synapsed SC, followed immediately by non-homologous synapsis with the alternate pairing partner, progressing from the ends toward the middle. Adjustment occurs during the first half of pachytene, but is not closely synchronized with sub-stage. It is complete by late pachytene, the loop having been eliminated in all cases and replaced by "straight" SCs in which the inverted region is heterosynapsis. Synapsis in the adjustment phase is evidently permitted only after the homosynaptic phase, and is indifferent to homology. It may lead to hetersynapsis, as in the inversion region, or to synapsis of homologous regions not synapsed at zytogene. The anaphase bridge frequency, a measure of crossing over within the inversion, is about 34% for both inversions studied, indicating that such crossovers do not block adjustment, that crossing over probably occurs before or during the adjustment period, and that there is some crossover suppression. The last could be the consequence of blocking by desynapsis/heterosynapsis. Synaptic adjustment appears to be a general phenomenon that occurs to varying extents in different forms. A hypothetical scheme for two phases of synapsis is proposed: at zytogene, a basic propensity for indifferent SC formation is limited by a restricting condition to synapsis between homologous regions, Subsequently, the restriction is lifted, whereupon synaptic instability is resolved by desynapsis, followed by resynapsis that is indifferent to homology, but that results in a topologically more stable structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7075348     DOI: 10.1007/bf00292848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  13 in total

1.  An Analysis of Crossing over within a Heterozygous Inversion in Drosophila Melanogaster.

Authors:  E Novitski; G Braver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Biochemical analysis of meiosis in the male mouse. II. DNA metabolism at pachytene.

Authors:  Y Hotta; A C Chandley; H Stern
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1977-07-08       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  The temporal sequence of synaptic initiation, crossing over and synaptic completion.

Authors:  M P Maguire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nineteen paracentric chromosomal inversions in mice.

Authors:  T H Roderick; N L Hawes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fine structure of the synaptonemal complex. Regular and stereo electron microscopy of deoxyribonuclease-treated whole mount preparations.

Authors:  D E Comings; T A Okada
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Synapsis and crossing over within a paracentric inversion in the grasshopper, Camnula pellucida.

Authors:  U Nur
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Silver staining of synaptonemal complexes in surface spreads for light and electron microscopy.

Authors:  M E Dresser; M J Moses
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.905

8.  Chromosome organization during male meiosis in Bombyx mori.

Authors:  J B Rattner; M R Goldsmith; B A Hamkalo
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. III. Cytogenetic observations on two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  P A Poorman; M J Moses; M T Davisson; T H Roderick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Synaptosomal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. II. Synaptic adjustment in a tandem duplication.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  63 in total

1.  Sex-chromosome pairing through heterochromatin in the African rodent Lemniscomys barbarus (Rodentia, Muridae). A synaptonemal complex study.

Authors:  S Stitou; R Jiménez; R Díaz de La Guardia; M Burgos
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Paul S Burgoyne; Edward P Evans; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Synapsis in single and double heterozygotes for partially overlapping inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse.

Authors:  P M Borodin; I P Gorlov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Prediction of mammalian meiotic synaptic and recombinational behavior of inversion heterozygotes based on mitotic breakpoint data and the possible evolutionary consequences.

Authors:  T Ashley
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Synaptic interrelationships between the segments of the heteromorphic bivalent in double heterozygotes for paracentric inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse.

Authors:  P M Borodin; I P Gorlov
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Heterozygous insertions alter crossover distribution but allow crossover interference in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Marc Hammarlund; M Wayne Davis; Hung Nguyen; Dustin Dayton; Erik M Jorgensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Further examination of the production-line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. II. T(14; 15)6Ca heterozygotes.

Authors:  C Tease; G Fisher
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Transition from somatic to meiotic pairing and progressional changes of the synaptonemal complex in spermatocytes of Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  A Wandall; A Svendsen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Meiotic exchange and segregation in female mice heterozygous for paracentric inversions.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Stefanie E Schrump; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Correlation of meiotic events in testis sections and microspreads of mouse spermatocytes relative to the mid-pachytene checkpoint.

Authors:  Terry Ashley; Ann P Gaeth; Laura B Creemers; Adelle M Hack; Dirk G de Rooij
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 4.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.