Literature DB >> 21327492

Recombination-suppression: how many mechanisms for chromosomal speciation?

Benjamin Charles Jackson1.   

Abstract

Over the past decade several theoretical and empirical studies have revived interest in the role of chromosomes in speciation. The resulting models do not suffer from the problems experienced by previously proposed mechanisms of chromosomal speciation, because they invoke suppression of recombination rather than a reduction in the fitness of heterokaryotypes as their core process. However, they are not free from difficulties. The evidence for recombination-suppression models is discussed here. The general conclusion is that a consensus opinion on which models best describe the real-world situation is currently unlikely because of an inability of the available empirical evidence to fully distinguish between them, which may be due in part to a lack of exclusivity. I argue that future work should take this lack of exclusivity into account. Resolving the biogeography of speciation is also suggested in order to tell the various models apart. Further study is needed which focuses on confirming the operation of individual elements of the various models, rather than attempting to validate any single mechanism as a whole.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21327492     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-011-9558-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  48 in total

1.  Waiting time to parapatric speciation.

Authors:  S Gavrilets
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Kirsten M Brown; Lisa M Burk; Loren M Henagan; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Mechanisms of genetic exchange within the chromosomal inversions of Drosophila pseudoobscura.

Authors:  Stephen W Schaeffer; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution.

Authors:  J A Coyne; S Aulard; A Berry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Plant speciation.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; John H Willis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Tamara S Haselkorn; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The evolutionary genetics of speciation.

Authors:  J A Coyne; H A Orr
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; J Whitton; K Gardner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 13.915

10.  Chromosomal speciation and molecular divergence--accelerated evolution in rearranged chromosomes.

Authors:  Arcadi Navarro; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  Genomic impacts of chromosomal inversions in parapatric Drosophila species.

Authors:  Suzanne E McGaugh; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Chromosome synapsis and recombination in simple and complex chromosomal heterozygotes of tuco-tuco (Ctenomys talarum: Rodentia: Ctenomyidae).

Authors:  Ekaterina A Basheva; Anna A Torgasheva; Maria Jimena Gomez Fernandez; Emma Boston; Patricia Mirol; Pavel M Borodin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Chromosomal evolution and patterns of introgression in helianthus.

Authors:  Jessica G Barb; John E Bowers; Sebastien Renaut; Juan I Rey; Steven J Knapp; Loren H Rieseberg; John M Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Sex and speciation: the paradox that non-recombining DNA promotes recombination.

Authors:  Alexander Idnurm
Journal:  Fungal Biol Rev       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 4.706

5.  Effects of inversions on within- and between-species recombination and divergence.

Authors:  Laurie S Stevison; Kenneth B Hoehn; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 6.  Advances in cytogenetics of Brazilian rodents: cytotaxonomy, chromosome evolution and new karyotypic data.

Authors:  Camilla Bruno Di-Nizo; Karina Rodrigues da Silva Banci; Yukie Sato-Kuwabara; Maria José de J Silva
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 1.800

7.  Reorganization of the Y Chromosomes Enhances Divergence in Israeli Mole Rats Nannospalax ehrenbergi (Spalacidae, Rodentia): Comparative Analysis of Meiotic and Mitotic Chromosomes.

Authors:  Sergey Matveevsky; Elena Ivanitskaya; Victor Spangenberg; Irina Bakloushinskaya; Oxana Kolomiets
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Highly divergent karyotypes and barcoding of the East African genus Gonatoxia Karsch (Orthoptera: Phaneropterinae).

Authors:  Elżbieta Warchałowska-Śliwa; Beata Grzywacz; Maciej Kociński; Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska; Klaus-Gerhard Heller; Claudia Hemp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.