Literature DB >> 16593777

Speciation by monobrachial centric fusions.

R J Baker1, J W Bickham.   

Abstract

Fixation of centric fusions in natural populations often encounters minimal meiotic problems due to the ability of trivalents to segregate normally; therefore, little sterility barrier is achieved between a founder population and the parental stock. However, a strong sterility barrier can develop between different founder populations fixed for centric fusions that are monobrachially homologous in the resulting biarmed chromosomes (one arm is homologous but the other is nonhomologous). Hybridization through secondary contact then results in complex multivalents, which encounter problems in segregation and produce unbalanced gametes. Speciation mediated by centric fusions is a peripatric speciation model that does not postulate populational phenomena atypical of those characteristic of most mammals. The model appears applicable to a diversity of mammalian taxa such as bats of the Rhogeessa tumida-parvula complex, shrews of the Sorex araneus complex, and rodents of the Mus musculus and Rattus rattus complexes.

Entities:  

Year:  1986        PMID: 16593777      PMCID: PMC386904          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  15 in total

1.  Robertsonian metacentrics in the mouse.

Authors:  E Capanna; A Gropp; H Winking; G Noack; M V Civitelli
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1976-11-29       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Speciation in flowering plants.

Authors:  H Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Chromosome banding pattern in a polymorphic population of Sorex araneus from northeastern Finland.

Authors:  L Halkka; O Halkka; U Skarén; V Söderlund
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  The role of chromosomal rearrangement in mammalian speciation with special reference to Cetacea and Pinnipedia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Numerous chromosomal polymorphisms in a natural population of rice rats (Oryzomys, Cricetidae).

Authors:  B F Koop; R J Baker; H H Genoways
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1983

6.  Models of evolution of reproductive isolation.

Authors:  M Nei; T Maruyama; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in southern Germany. I. Cytogenetic study.

Authors:  S Adolph; J Klein
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Genetic variation of wild mouse populations in southern Germany. II. Serological study.

Authors:  F Figueroa; Z Zaleska-Rutczynska; S Adolph; J H Nadeau; J Klein
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Robertsonian numerical variation in animal speciation: Mus musculus, an emblematic model.

Authors:  E Capanna
Journal:  Prog Clin Biol Res       Date:  1982

10.  Laboratory mice carrying three pairs of Robertsonian translocations: establishment of a strain and analysis of meiotic segregation.

Authors:  B J White; C Crandall; E S Raveché; J H Hjio
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1978
View more
  57 in total

1.  Centromeric heterochromatin in the cattle rob(1;29) translocation: alpha-satellite I sequences, in-situ MspI digestion patterns, chromomycin staining and C-bands.

Authors:  R Chaves; J S Heslop-Harrsion; H Guedes-Pinto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Fertility assessment in hybrids between monobrachially homologous Rb races of the house mouse from the island of Madeira: implications for modes of chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  A C Nunes; J Catalan; J Lopez; M da Graça Ramalhinho; M da Luz Mathias; J Britton-Davidian
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Gene flow despite complex Robertsonian fusions among rock-wallaby (Petrogale) species.

Authors:  Sally Potter; Craig Moritz; Mark D B Eldridge
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Lack of underdominance in a naturally occurring pericentric inversion in Drosophila melanogaster and its implications for chromosome evolution.

Authors:  J A Coyne; S Aulard; A Berry
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparative cytogenetics of bats (Chiroptera): the prevalence of Robertsonian translocations limits the power of chromosomal characters in resolving interfamily phylogenetic relationships.

Authors:  Xiuguang Mao; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Weiting Su; Qing Feng; Yingxiang Wang; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 6.  The molecular evolutionary basis of species formation.

Authors:  Daven C Presgraves
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Hemiplasy and homoplasy in the karyotypic phylogenies of mammals.

Authors:  Terence J Robinson; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phylogeny and vicariant speciation of the Grey Rhebok, Pelea capreolus.

Authors:  T J Robinson; H Cernohorska; G Diedericks; K Cabelova; A Duran; C A Matthee
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Impact of Robertsonian translocation on meiosis and reproduction: an impala (Aepyceros melampus) model.

Authors:  Miluse Vozdova; Hana Sebestova; Svatava Kubickova; Halina Cernohorska; Thuraya Awadova; Jiri Vahala; Jiri Rubes
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chromosomal heterozygosity and fertility in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) from Northern Italy.

Authors:  H C Hauffe; J B Searle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.