Literature DB >> 16838545

Processing unattended speech.

Marie Rivenez1, Christopher J Darwin, Anne Guillaume.   

Abstract

Three experiments examine the effect of a difference in fundamental frequency (F0) range between two simultaneous voices on the processing of unattended speech. Previous experiments have only found evidence for the processing of nominally unattended speech when it has consisted of isolated words which could have attracted the listener's attention. A paradigm recently used by Dupoux et al. [J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 29(1), 172-184 (2003)] was modified so that participants had to detect a target word belonging to a specific category presented in a rapid list of words in the attended ear. In the unattended ear, concatenated sentences were presented, some containing a repetition prime presented just before a target word. Primes speeded category detection by 25 ms when the two messages were in a difference F0 range. This priming effect was unaffected by whether the target was led to the left or the right ear, but disappeared when there was no F0 range difference between the messages. Finally, it was replicated when participants were compelled to focus on the attended message in order to perform a second task. The results demonstrate that repetition priming can be produced by words in unattended continuous speech provided that there is a difference in F0 range between the voices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838545     DOI: 10.1121/1.2190162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Jamie Chevalier; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Top-down or bottom up: decreased stimulus salience increases responses to predictable stimuli of auditory thalamic neurons.

Authors:  Srinivasa P Kommajosyula; Rui Cai; Edward Bartlett; Donald M Caspary
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The interaction of vocal characteristics and audibility in the recognition of concurrent syllables.

Authors:  Martin D Vestergaard; Nicholas R C Fyson; Roy D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The impact of noise and hearing loss on the processing of simultaneous sentences.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Frederick J Gallun; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  An ERP investigation of dichotic repetition priming with temporally overlapping stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

7.  Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Martin R Coleman; Anthony R Absalom; Jennifer M Rodd; Ingrid S Johnsrude; Basil F Matta; Adrian M Owen; David K Menon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Spatial release from energetic and informational masking in a divided speech identification task.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Attentional Modulation of Hierarchical Speech Representations in a Multitalker Environment.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kiremitçi; Özgür Yilmaz; Emin Çelik; Mo Shahdloo; Alexander G Huth; Tolga Çukur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.861

10.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.