Literature DB >> 21786899

Generating partially correlated noise--a comparison of methods.

William M Hartmann1, Yun Jin Cho.   

Abstract

There are three standard methods for generating two channels of partially correlated noise: the two-generator method, the three-generator method, and the symmetric-generator method. These methods allow an experimenter to specify a target cross correlation between the two channels, but actual generated noises show statistical variability around the target value. Numerical experiments were done to compare the variability for those methods as a function of the number of degrees of freedom. The results of the experiments quantify the stimulus uncertainty in diverse binaural psychoacoustical experiments: incoherence detection, perceived auditory source width, envelopment, noise localization/lateralization, and the masking level difference. The numerical experiments found that when the elemental generators have unequal powers, the different methods all have similar variability. When the powers are constrained to be equal, the symmetric-generator method has much smaller variability than the other two.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21786899      PMCID: PMC3155589          DOI: 10.1121/1.3596475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  A binaural analog of gap detection.

Authors:  M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relation of masked threshold to signal-duration for various interaural phasecombinations.

Authors:  H C BLODGETT; L A JEFFRESS; R W TAYLOR
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1958-03

3.  Detection of interaural correlation by neurons in the superior olivary complex, inferior colliculus and auditory cortex of the unanesthetized rabbit.

Authors:  Charles S Coffey; Charles S Ebert; Allen F Marshall; John D Skaggs; Stephanie E Falk; William D Crocker; James M Pearson; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Sensitivity to interaural correlation of single neurons in the inferior colliculus of guinea pigs.

Authors:  Trevor M Shackleton; Robert H Arnott; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

5.  Binaural comodulation masking release: effects of masker interaural correlation.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence: bandwidth effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; William M Hartmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On the use of the normalized correlation as an index of interaural envelope correlation.

Authors:  L R Bernstein; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Lateralization of large interaural delays.

Authors:  J E Mossop; J F Culling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural detection as a function of interaural correlation and bandwidth of masking noise: implications for estimates of spectral resolution.

Authors:  M van der Heijden; C Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Responses of neurons in the auditory pathway of the barn owl to partially correlated binaural signals.

Authors:  Y Albeck; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Relating interaural difference sensitivities for several parameters measured in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Spencer; Monica L Hawley; H Steven Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Pamela E Souza; Frederick J Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Apparent auditory source width insensitivity in older hearing-impaired individuals.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The perception of apparent auditory source width in hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  William M Whitmer; Bernhard U Seeber; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of interaural decoherence on sensitivity to interaural level differences across frequency.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  Similar Impacts of the Interaural Delay and Interaural Correlation on Binaural Gap Detection.

Authors:  Lingzhi Kong; Zilong Xie; Lingxi Lu; Tianshu Qu; Xihong Wu; Jun Yan; Liang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The "Missing 6 dB" Revisited: Influence of Room Acoustics and Binaural Parameters on the Loudness Mismatch Between Headphones and Loudspeakers.

Authors:  Florian Denk; Michael Kohnen; Josep Llorca-Bofí; Michael Vorländer; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.