Literature DB >> 2645437

Current state and future developments of noninvasive treatment of human urinary stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

C G Chaussy1, G J Fuchs.   

Abstract

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has now been in clinical use for 8 years and it has replaced other treatment techniques for the majority of surgical calculi in the upper urinary tract. For the first time it provides a completely noninvasive method for the treatment of renal and ureteral stones. The current range of its indications includes approximately 70 per cent of nonselected urinary stone patients. An additional 25 per cent of the patients with more complex stones in the upper urinary tract can receive treatment with the lithotriptor combined with endourological procedures. More recent additions to the range of clinical routine applications with the original lithotriptor have been its use on common bile duct stones combined with endosurgical or radiological manipulations. With a modified kidney lithotriptor gallstones have been treated successfully, which has led to the development of a multipurpose device for biliary and urinary stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2645437     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41010-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  46 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Ureteroscopy in proximal ureteral stones after shock wave lithotripsy failure: Is it safe and efficient or dangerous?

Authors:  Muhammet Fatih Kilinc; Omer Gokhan Doluoglu; Tolga Karakan; Ayhan Dalkilic; Nurettin Cem Sonmez; Yasin Aydogmus; Berkan Resorlu
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  The effect of reflector geometry on the acoustic field and bubble dynamics produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhou; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Surgical aspects of urolithiasis in children.

Authors:  H el-Damanhoury; R Bürger; R Hohenfellner
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 7.  Interventional procedures in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  M P Banner; P Ramchandani; H M Pollack
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Does previous failed ESWL have a negative impact of on the outcome of ureterorenoscopy? A matched pair analysis.

Authors:  Prodromos Philippou; David Payne; Kim Davenport; Anthony G Timoney; Francis X Keeley
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Epidural opioids as anaesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in two patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  B S Silbert; G C Dixon; R Kluger; J Berg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 10.  Shock wave lithotripsy: advances in technology and technique.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; James A McAteer; Ehud Gnessin; Andrew P Evan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.