Literature DB >> 16838173

[Shaft lengthening in hip replacement: experimental studies on bending stiffness].

K Burkhart1, D Mehler, J Degreif, P M Rommens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cortical atrophy of the proximal femur can be seen after wearing a total hip prosthesis for several years because loads are borne distally at the prosthesis tip. To achieve stable prosthesis implantation on the one hand and proximal bone regeneration on the other hand in hip revision arthroplasty, lengthening of the shaft component distributes loading forces to the femoral shaft first. It concentrates them to the proximal femur later through a higher elasticity.
METHODS: In a three-point bending study the bending stiffness of an elastic slotted hip prosthesis shaft lengthening (HSL) was compared with that of the Synthes universal femoral nail (MN) and the unslotted HSL.
RESULTS: The slotting of the elastic HSL has a significant influence on its bending stiffness; it lies 1,287 N/mm (76%) over that of the MN, but 1,855 N/mm (38%) under that of the unslotted HSL. Altogether the slotted HSL is rather more comparable to the MN than to the unslotted HSL regarding its bending conduct.
CONCLUSION: The results confirm the elasticity of the slotted HSL in the style of conventional intramedullary nailing and encourage-above all in the context of previous clinical studies-its further use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16838173     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1101-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  22 in total

1.  Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. An in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems.

Authors:  Y H Kim; J S Kim; S H Cho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register.

Authors:  T J Puolakka; K J Pajamäki; P J Halonen; P O Pulkkinen; P Paavolainen; J K Nevalainen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-10

Review 3.  Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface.

Authors:  D R Sumner; J O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Femoral reconstruction with massive allograft and cementless prosthesis.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; M S Bradford; T I Younger
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec

5.  [Fixation of endoprostheses with or without cement?].

Authors:  H G Willert
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

6.  [Femur revision prosthesis].

Authors:  H Wagner; M Wagner
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec

7.  [Bone remodeling after reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. A histomorphometric study].

Authors:  M Runkel; K Wenda; A Stelzig; B A Rahn; S Störkel; G Ritter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Femoral shaft fracture after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J S Jensen; G Barfod; D Hansen; E Larsen; F Linde; H Menck; B Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1988-02

9.  Factors affecting femoral bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; C Sychterz; C Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures.

Authors:  R K Beals; S S Tower
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.