Literature DB >> 10475568

Factors affecting femoral bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

C A Engh1, C Sychterz, C Engh.   

Abstract

We performed a postmortem comparison of femurs from two patients who had bilateral cementless total hip arthroplasties with femoral prostheses of different stiffness implanted in their right and left hips. Radiographs of transverse sections of the four femurs demonstrated that all the prostheses were bone ingrown with the most ingrowth occurring distally where the porous coating contacted diaphyseal bone. In both patients, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis revealed that the femur implanted with the stiffer prosthesis had a 65% to 79% greater loss of proximal periprosthetic bone than the femur implanted with the more flexible prosthesis. One patient, however, had a dramatically greater total loss of bone from side to side than the other patient. In this patient, we believe that it was host factors more than the differences in stem stiffness that affected the bone-remodeling pattern. Although the two femurs with the stiffer prostheses had the greatest bone loss, the two femurs with the more flexible prostheses demonstrated radiographic signs of cantilever bending of the prosthetic stem and failure of proximal osseointegration. We are not aware of any other bilateral human postmortem analysis that so clearly illustrates the effect of stem stiffness on bone remodeling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10475568     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90091-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Osseointegration in hip prostheses: experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  C Doria; V De Santis; G Falcone; L Proietti; E De Santis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem.

Authors:  Alex Leali; Joseph F Fetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bone mineral density of the proximal femur recovers after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Matteo Cadossi; Antonio Moroni; Matteo Romagnoli; Eugenio Chiarello; Cesare Faldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

4.  Long-term follow-up of primary total hip arthroplasty with the Alloclassic Variall system.

Authors:  Josef Hochreiter; Giovanni Brusaferri; Klaus Kirschbichler; Katja Emmanuel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Shaft lengthening in hip replacement: experimental studies on bending stiffness].

Authors:  K Burkhart; D Mehler; J Degreif; P M Rommens
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

7.  Bone remodelling around HA-coated acetabular cups : a DEXA study with a 3-year follow-up in a randomised trial.

Authors:  M B Laursen; P T Nielsen; K Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Periprosthetic bone loss after insertion of an uncemented, customized femoral stem and an uncemented anatomical stem. A randomized DXA study with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mona Nysted; Pål Benum; Jomar Klaksvik; Olav Foss; Arild Aamodt
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Periprosthetic fracture caused by stress shielding after implantation of a femoral condyle endoprosthesis in a transfemoral amputee-a case report.

Authors:  Tina S Wik; Olav A Foss; Steinar Havik; Leif Persen; Arild Aamodt; Eivind Witsø
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.