Literature DB >> 16835791

[Presbyopia correction using intraocular lenses].

M P Holzer1, T M Rabsilber, G U Auffarth.   

Abstract

Modern cataract surgery has advanced tremendously over the past 20 years. Improved surgical techniques, as well as improved implant materials and designs, have enlarged patient profiles and indications not only for cataract surgery, but also for refractive lens exchange surgery. This has also created much higher patient expectations. The loss of accommodation is a loss of quality of life for presbyopic and especially young pseudophakic patients. Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL) have been implanted since 1986, starting with 2-3 zone refractive and diffractive designs. Due to the surgical techniques available at that time, MIOL decentration and surgically induced astigmatism were possible complications. In addition, reduced contrast perception and increased glare were common problems of MIOL because of their optical principles. New developments in this field in recent years such as the folding, multizonal, progressive refractive MIOL and aspheric diffractive MIOL in combination with improved surgical techniques have overcome those initial problems. Therefore, modern MIOL (and in the future also accommodative IOL) can be considered not only for the correction of aphakia but also for refractive purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16835791     DOI: 10.1007/s00347-006-1382-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  33 in total

1.  Driving simulation study: bilateral array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  K A Featherstone; J R Bloomfield; A J Lang; M J Miller-Meeks; G Woodworth; R F Steinert
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Refractive Surgery Survey 2001.

Authors:  Kerry D Solomon; Mike P Holzer; Helga P Sandoval; Luis G Vargas; Liliana Werner; David T Vroman; Terrance J Kasper; David J Apple
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  The mechanism of accommodation in primates.

Authors:  A Glasser; P L Kaufman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 4.  Multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  J L Pearce
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.761

5.  Contrast sensitivity and glare disability with diffractive and refractive multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S Pieh; H Weghaupt; C Skorpik
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 6.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery.

Authors:  S Jain; I Arora; D T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Oliver Findl; Barbara Kiss; Vanessa Petternel; Rupert Menapace; Michael Georgopoulos; Georg Rainer; Wolfgang Drexler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  The aetiology of presbyopia: a summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures.

Authors:  B Gilmartin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 9.  [Multifocal intraocular lenses. A review].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; H B Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  Scleral expansion surgery does not restore accommodation in human presbyopia.

Authors:  S Mathews
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  10 in total

1.  Analysis of optical side-effects of fs-laser therapy in human presbyopic lens simulated with modified contact lenses.

Authors:  Monika Peter; Robert Kammel; Roland Ackermann; Stefan Schramm; Bernd-Ulrich Seifert; Katharina Frey; Marcus Blum; Stefan Nolte; Kathleen S Kunert
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Use of multifocal intraocular lenses and criteria for patient selection].

Authors:  T Kohnen; D Kook; G U Auffarth; V Derhartunian
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  [Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. Investigation of the Array SA40N vs. Acri. Twin at the "physical eye" according to Reiner and Jacobi].

Authors:  F K Jacobi; W Kessler; S Held
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses with different near addition].

Authors:  U Mester; B Junker; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [First results with a new aberration correcting bifocal intraocular lens].

Authors:  H Kaymak; U Mester
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy.

Authors:  Alexandra Anton; Daniel Böhringer; Michael Bach; Thomas Reinhard; Florian Birnbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  [Functional results after bilateral intrastromal femtosecond laser correction of presbyopia].

Authors:  R Khoramnia; M P Holzer; A Fitting; G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 8.  [Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber; T Kohnen; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  [Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR].

Authors:  K Petermeier; P Szurman
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

10.  The Influence of Angle Alpha, Angle Kappa, and Optical Aberrations on Visual Outcomes after the Implantation of a High-Addition Trifocal IOL.

Authors:  Guadalupe Cervantes-Coste; André Tapia; Claudia Corredor-Ortega; Mariana Osorio; Rafael Valdez; Martha Massaro; Cecilio Velasco-Barona; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.