Literature DB >> 11263036

[Multifocal intraocular lenses. A review].

G U Auffarth1, H B Dick.   

Abstract

Modern cataract surgery has developed tremendously during the past 10-15 years. Improved surgical techniques, as well as improved implant materials and designs, have enlarged patient profiles and indications for cataract surgery. This also created much higher expectations from the patients' site. The loss of accommodation is loss of quality of life for presbyopic and especially young pseudophakic patients. Therefore cataract surgery with multifocal IOL implantation is not only of academic interest, but reflects demands and expectations of our patients. Multifocal IOLs have been implanted since 1986, starting with 2-3 zone refractive and diffractive designs. Due to surgical techniques of that time MIOL decentration and surgically induced astigmatism were possible complications. In addition reduced contrast sensitivity and increased glare were common problems of MIOL because of their optical principles. New developments in this field in recent years such as the multizonal, progressive refractive MIOL in combination with improved surgical techniques have overcome those initial problems. Therefore, modern multifocal IOLs can be considered not only for correction of aphakia but also for refractive purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11263036     DOI: 10.1007/s003470170172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  8 in total

1.  [History of the development of intraocular lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; D J Apple
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Use of multifocal intraocular lenses and criteria for patient selection].

Authors:  T Kohnen; D Kook; G U Auffarth; V Derhartunian
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Presbyopia correction using intraocular lenses].

Authors:  M P Holzer; T M Rabsilber; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  [Functional results with two multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOL). Array SA40 versus Acri.Twin].

Authors:  U Mester; P Dillinger; N Anterist; H Kaymak
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  [Optical performance of multifocal intraocular lenses. Investigation of the Array SA40N vs. Acri. Twin at the "physical eye" according to Reiner and Jacobi].

Authors:  F K Jacobi; W Kessler; S Held
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  [Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses].

Authors:  G U Auffarth; T M Rabsilber; T Kohnen; M P Holzer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  [Subjective and objective outcome following implantation of the apodized diffractive AcrySof ReSTOR].

Authors:  K Petermeier; P Szurman
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Béatrice Cochener; Antoine Lafuma; Babak Khoshnood; Laurène Courouve; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.