Literature DB >> 19229527

Selective influence of prior allocentric knowledge on the kinesthetic learning of a path.

Matthieu Lafon1, Manuel Vidal, Alain Berthoz.   

Abstract

Spatial cognition studies have described two main cognitive strategies involved in the memorization of traveled paths in human navigation. One of these strategies uses the action-based memory (egocentric) of the traveled route or paths, which involves kinesthetic memory, optic flow, and episodic memory, whereas the other strategy privileges a survey memory of cartographic type (allocentric). Most studies have dealt with these two strategies separately, but none has tried to show the interaction between them in spite of the fact that we commonly use a map to imagine our journey and then proceed using egocentric navigation. An interesting question is therefore: how does prior allocentric knowledge of the environment affect the egocentric, purely kinesthetic navigation processes involved in human navigation? We designed an experiment in which blindfolded subjects had first to walk and memorize a path with kinesthetic cues only. They had previously been shown a map of the path, which was either correct or distorted (consistent shrinking or growing). The latter transformations were studied in order to observe what influence a distorted prior knowledge could have on spatial mechanisms. After having completed the first learning travel along the path, they had to perform several spatial tasks during the testing phase: (1) pointing towards the origin and (2) to specific points encountered along the path, (3) a free locomotor reproduction, and (4) a drawing of the memorized path. The results showed that prior cartographic knowledge influences the paths drawn and the spatial inference capacity, whereas neither locomotor reproduction nor spatial updating was disturbed. Our results strongly support the notion that (1) there are two independent neural bases underlying these mechanisms: a map-like representation allowing allocentric spatial inferences, and a kinesthetic memory of self-motion in space; and (2) a common use of, or a switching between, these two strategies is possible. Nevertheless, allocentric representations can emerge from the experience of kinesthetic cues alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19229527     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1728-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  39 in total

1.  Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: implications for haptic spatial representations.

Authors:  R L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

2.  Does mental simulation of following a path improve navigation performance without vision?

Authors:  Stéphane Vieilledent; Stephen M Kosslyn; Alain Berthoz; Marie Dominique Giraudo
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-04

3.  Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Marios N Avraamides; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 4.  Multiple systems of spatial memory and action.

Authors:  Marios N Avraamides; Jonathan W Kelly
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-09-27

5.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. I. Kinesthetic versus visual target presentation.

Authors:  S V Adamovich; M B Berkinblit; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Intermittent versus continuous visual control: a reply to Elliott.

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Continuous visual information may be important after all: a failure to replicate Thomson (1983).

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.

Authors:  R D Easton; M J Sholl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?

Authors:  J A Thomson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The role of visual experience in knowledge of spatial layout.

Authors:  J J Rieser; J J Lockman; H L Pick
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-09
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory.

Authors:  Gaspare Galati; Gina Pelle; Alain Berthoz; Giorgia Committeri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Walking and Walkability: Is Wayfinding a Missing Link? Implications for Public Health Practice.

Authors:  Ann E Vandenberg; Rebecca H Hunter; Lynda A Anderson; Lucinda L Bryant; Steven P Hooker; William A Satariano
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2015-05-12

3.  Motor transfer from map ocular exploration to locomotion during spatial navigation from memory.

Authors:  Alixia Demichelis; Gérard Olivier; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Egocentric representation acquired from offline map learning.

Authors:  Chengli Xiao; Lei Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.