Literature DB >> 8354967

Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.

P R Killeen1, H Cate, T Tran.   

Abstract

Preferences of hungry pigeons among 10 grains and pellets were analyzed using a Thurstone scaling procedure. The recovered scales were positively correlated with size of the feed. The correlations improved when the Thurstonian assumption of equal-sized discriminal dispersions (Case V) was replaced with the assumption of proportional-sized dispersions (Case VI), as entailed by Weber's law. The correlations weakened when the experiments were conducted with the pigeons close to their free-feeding weights, where the probability of sampling alternative grains increased. In the final experiment, exposure to a large pellet shifted the preferences between two smaller pellets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8354967      PMCID: PMC1322155          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  On the use of inconsistency of preferences in psychological measurement.

Authors:  C H COOMBS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-01

2.  Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement.

Authors:  S E Lea; T J Roper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Handling time and choice in pigeons.

Authors:  S J Shettleworth
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: IV. Magnitude of reward.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching-based hedonic scaling in the pigeon.

Authors:  H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Selective attention and search images in pigeons.

Authors:  P M Blough
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-07

7.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.

Authors:  C H COOMBS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Working harder for less: effect of incentive value on force of instrumental response in humans.

Authors:  F Svartdal
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1993-02
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  MPR.

Authors:  Peter R. Killeen; Matthew T. Sitomer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Economics, ecologics, and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains when alternatives differ on multiple dimensions of reinforcement.

Authors:  Elizabeth G E Kyonka; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Models of ratio schedule performance.

Authors:  L A Bizo; P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-07

6.  Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine.

Authors:  Z Zhang; J F Rickard; S Body; K Asgari; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons.

Authors:  B O Ploog; H P Zeigler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Food choice in the laboratory pigeon.

Authors:  Traci Biedermann; Dennis Garlick; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Impulsivity and risk-seeking as Bayesian inference under dopaminergic control.

Authors:  John G Mikhael; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columbia livia) are sensitive to the distance to food, but only rats request more food when distance increases.

Authors:  Mark P Reilly; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Lauren C Kettle; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.