Literature DB >> 16812317

Autoshaped responding: A baseline for studying stimulus preference.

A C Catania, M C Owens, V Von Lossberg.   

Abstract

In an autoshaping procedure with pigeons, trials consisted of the illumination of two keys, each with a different color, and then a response-independent feeder operation. Over successive conditions, all key-color pairs were arranged from the set of amber, red, green, and blue lamps. During sessions with a given pair, the left-right configuration of the colors varied irregularly, and the two colors alternated in illuminating the feeder. With one red and one green key, for example, red appeared sometimes on the left and sometimes on the right, and the feeder was alternately lit red or green on successive trials. Both total pecks and proportion of trials with at least one peck on a key of a given color were generally greater for red and amber than for green and blue, and relations among preferences were generally transitive across different color pairs. Repeating the procedure with decreased red and amber intensities and increased green and blue intensities reduced red and amber pecking relative to green and blue pecking, implying that differences in responding were determined more strongly by intensive than by chromatic properties of the stimuli.

Entities:  

Year:  1983        PMID: 16812317      PMCID: PMC1347918          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Distinctiveness of color, form, and position cues for pigeons.

Authors:  L V JONES
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-06

2.  The role of elicited responding in behavioral contrast.

Authors:  K Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Concurrent performances: inhibition of one response by reinforcement of another.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania; T Sagvolden
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimulus generalization from feeder to response key in the acquisition of autoshaped pecking.

Authors:  S E Sperling; M E Perkins; H J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Natural concepts in pigeons.

Authors:  R J Hernstein; D H Loveland; C Cable
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-10

7.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Wavelength generalization and preference in monochromatically reared ducklings.

Authors:  W K Tracy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effect of proximity of elements on the feature-positive effect.

Authors:  R S Sainsbury
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Acquisition, generalization, and discrimination reversal of a natural concept.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1979-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.

Authors:  G B Biederman; K G McDonald; G A Heighington; M Vanayan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.