Literature DB >> 16812181

Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons.

A C Catania, T Sagvolden.   

Abstract

In a six-key chamber variable-interval initial links of concurrent-chain schedules operated on two lower white keys. Terminal links operated on four upper keys; green keys were correlated with fixed-interval reinforcement and red keys with extinction. Free-choice terminal links arranged three green keys and one red key; forced-choice terminal links arranged one green key and three red keys. Thus, terminal links were equivalent in number, variety, and information value (in bits) of the keylights. Preferences (relative initial-link rates) were studied both with location of the odd key color varying over successive terminal links and with the odd color fixed at key locations that had controlled either relatively high or relatively low terminal-link response rates. Free choice was consistently preferred to forced choice. Magnitude of preference did not vary systematically with terminal-link response rate or stimulus control by green and red keys. The origins of free-choice preference could be ontogenic or phylogenic: organisms may learn that momentarily preferred alternatives are more often available in free than in forced choice, and evolutionary contingencies may favor the survival of organisms that prefer free to forced choice.

Year:  1980        PMID: 16812181      PMCID: PMC1332946          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stereotypy and intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Variability of response location for pigeons responding under continuous reinforcement, intermittent reinforcement, and extinction.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; R N Lanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Freedom and knowledge: an experimental analysis of preference in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.

Authors:  S M Leigland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning.

Authors:  P Rozin; J W Kalat
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Conditioning response variability.

Authors:  W N Schoenfeld; A H Harris; J Farmer
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-10
View more
  39 in total

1.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by escape versus attention.

Authors:  Cathryn Romaniuk; Raymond Miltenberger; Carole Conyers; Nicole Jenner; Mandy Jurgens; Crystal Ringenberg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Effects of experience on preference between forced and free choice.

Authors:  Koichi Ono
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

5.  Toward effective and preferred programming: a case for the objective measurement of social validity with recipients of behavior-change programs.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2010

6.  The acquisition and maintenance of behavioral skills: a response to Michael.

Authors:  C W Knapp
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1982

Review 7.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Variation, repetition, and choice.

Authors:  Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Kennon A Lattal; Cristiano V dos Santos; Ricardo A Matos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Autoshaped responding: A baseline for studying stimulus preference.

Authors:  A C Catania; M C Owens; V Von Lossberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.