Literature DB >> 16812740

Leaving patches: Effects of travel requirements.

D McCarthy, P Voss, M Davison.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained in an analogue foraging procedure in which, by completing a travel requirement, they entered a "patch" in which a reinforcer might be available after an unpredictable time. They also had the opportunity, by emitting a defined response, to exit the patch and travel to another patch. Prey availability in a patch was not signaled. Data were collected on the length of time that subjects stayed in patches before exiting (residence times) as a function of various travel requirements: travel for a fixed time in blackout, fixed-interval schedule traveling, fixed-time traveling with an added response required to terminate traveling, and fixed-ratio traveling. For each of these conditions, the required amount of travel (time or responses) was varied over a wide range. As previously reported, residence times increased with increases in fixed-time traveling, as they did with increasing fixed-interval or fixed-ratio traveling. There was no evidence that adding response or work requirements systematically affected residence time except via increased travel time, although 3 of the 5 birds stayed longer in a patch under higher fixed-ratio values. A "threshold-maximization" model described the data well with a single parameter that was consistent across subjects, procedures, and experiments.

Year:  1994        PMID: 16812740      PMCID: PMC1334457          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Representation of time.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R M Church
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-11

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Delayed reinforcement versus reinforcement after a fixed interval.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice, changeover, and travel: A quantitative model.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Leaving patches: An investigation of a laboratory analogue.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur; W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.

Authors:  T A Shahan; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Residence time and choice in concurrent foraging schedules.

Authors:  B M Jones; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.