Literature DB >> 16811944

Effects of a delay-reinforcement procedure on performance under IRT>t schedules.

F A Gonzalez, R J Newlin.   

Abstract

Water-deprived rats were studied under a compound schedule that prescribed that responses terminating interresponse times (IRTs) greater than a fixed value t(1) (IRT > t(1) component schedule) initiated a delay of reinforcement interval t(2), at the end of which water was presented if the subject did not respond (R > t(2) component schedule). If the subject responded before the t(2) interval elapsed, the IRT > t(1) component schedule was re-initiated and water was not presented. The IRT > t(1) and R > t(2) component schedules were not differentially correlated with distinctive stimuli. Rate of responding during the IRT > t(1) component decreased as a function of the value of t(2). The magnitude of the decreases in response rate appeared to be proportional to the subject's rate under the IRT > t schedule with no delay of reinforcement (t(2) = 0 sec). The effects were independent of the parameter value of the IRT > t(1) component schedule and of the rate of reinforcement. The results suggested that "efficiency" of performance under IRT > t schedules can be increased by appropriately arranging brief delays of reinforcement.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811944      PMCID: PMC1333509          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  EXTEROCEPTIVE CONTROL OF RESPONSE UNDER DELAYED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R AZZI; D S FIX; F S KELLER; M I ROCHAESILVA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A BEHAVIORAL EFFECT OF AMOBARBITAL.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol       Date:  1964-06-22

3.  SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.

Authors:  J E STADDON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  VARIABLES DETERMINING THE EFFECTS OF DELAY IN REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  C B FERSTER; C HAMMER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Analysis of effects of psychopharmacological agents in behavioral terms.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1958-12

7.  Fixed-ratio performance under conditions of delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavior under large values of the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule.

Authors:  W K Richardson; T E Loughead
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of different delay of reinforcement procedures on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  C H Pierce; P V Hanford; J Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Briefly delayed reinforcement: An interresponse time analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; D R Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.