Literature DB >> 16811344

Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: the effects on the pattern of responding of changes in requirements at reinforcement.

P B Dews.   

Abstract

In pigeons responding under a 180-sec fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement, the frequency distribution of the duration of the final interresponse time before the reinforcer was compared with the distribution of the preceding two interresponse times. The results confirmed qualitatively and quantitatively the expected preferential reinforcement of longer interreinforcement times under fixed-interval reinforcement. Requirements at reinforcement were then changed to eliminate the preferential reinforcement of longer interresponse times. Local patterns and mean rate of responding could change, without the characteristic fixed-interval pattern of increasing responding through the interval (scalloping) being much affected. It is concluded that this characteristic pattern of fixed-interval responding does not depend crucially on effects of the reinforcer at the moment of reinforcement, but rather to effects extending over much longer periods of time than just the last interresponse time.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811344      PMCID: PMC1338546          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  The effect of multiple S delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Analysis of effects of psychopharmacological agents in behavioral terms.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1958-12

4.  Effects of drugs on characteristics of behavior maintained by complex schedules of intermittent positive reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN; W H MORSE
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1956-11-02       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

6.  The effect of multiple S periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: IV. Effect of continuous S with only short S probes.

Authors:  P B Dews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  Ergeb Physiol       Date:  1968
  7 in total
  17 in total

1.  A comparison of ratio and interval reinforcement schedules with comparable interreinforcement times.

Authors:  G W Capehart; D A Eckerman; M Guilkey; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Fixed-interval matching-to-sample: intermatching time and intermatching error runs.

Authors:  T D Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Studies on responding under fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: II. The scalloped pattern of the cumulative record.

Authors:  P B Dews
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The microanalysis of fixed-interval responding.

Authors:  G D Gentry; B Weiss; V G Laties
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reinforcement of behavioral patterns: shaping a scallop.

Authors:  L Hawkes; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement schedules: the role of responses preceding the one that produces the reinforcer.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Briefly delayed reinforcement: An interresponse time analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal; D R Ziegler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The response-reinforcement dependency in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Graded differential reinforcement: Response-dependent reinforcer amount.

Authors:  G D Gentry; R T Eskew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on rate and stimulus control of matching to sample.

Authors:  M C Newland; M J Marr
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.