Literature DB >> 22673925

The copyist model of response emission.

Takayuki Tanno1, Alan Silberberg.   

Abstract

The variety of different performances maintained by schedules of reinforcement complicates comprehensive model creation. The present account assumes the simpler goal of modeling the performances of only variable reinforcement schedules because they tend to maintain steady response rates over time. The model presented assumes that rate is determined by the mean of interresponse times (time between two responses) between successive reinforcers, averaged so that their contribution to that mean diminishes exponentially with distance from reinforcement. To respond, the model randomly selects an interresponse time from the last 300 of these mean interresponse times, the selection likelihood arranged so that the proportion of session time spent emitting each of these 300 interresponse times is the same. This interresponse time defines the mean of an exponential distribution from which one is randomly chosen for emission. The response rates obtained approximated those found on several variable schedules. Furthermore, the model reproduced three effects: (1) the variable ratio maintaining higher response rates than does the variable interval; (2) the finding for variable schedules that when the reinforcement rate varies from low to high, the response rate function has an ascending and then descending limb; and (3) matching on concurrent schedules. Because these results are due to an algorithm that reproduces reinforced interresponse times, responding to single and concurrent schedules is viewed as merely copying what was reinforced before.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22673925     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0267-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  56 in total

1.  Performance on ratio and interval schedules with matched reinforcement rates.

Authors:  G R Dawson; A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1990-08

2.  The effect of deprivation and frequency of reinforcement on variable-interval responding.

Authors:  F C Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Molecular maximizing characterizes choice on Vaughan's (1981) procedure.

Authors:  A Silberberg; J M Ziriax
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Time allocation and response rate.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D Shurtleff; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Variable-ratio schedules as variable-interval schedules with linear feedback loops.

Authors:  J J McDowell; J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Molar function depends on molecular structure of behavior.

Authors:  C P Shimp; T Fremouw; L M Ingebritsen; K A Long
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1994-01

10.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Inter-response-time reinforcement and relative reinforcer frequency control choice.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Regularities in responding during performance of a complex choice task.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Toward the Unification of Molecular and Molar Analyses.

Authors:  Charles P Shimp
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2013

4.  Discrimination of variable schedules is controlled by interresponse times proximal to reinforcement.

Authors:  Takayuki Tanno; Alan Silberberg; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  A re-examination of responding on ratio and regulated-probability interval schedules.

Authors:  Omar D Pérez; Michael R F Aitken; Amy L Milton; Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2018-11

7.  Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.