Literature DB >> 16812074

The role of physical identity of the sample and correct comparison stimulus in matching-to-sample paradigms.

A Santi.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a higher-order conditional discrimination paradigm to assess the role of physical identity in a within-subjects design. A line orientation which was super-imposed on all response keys signalled whether a response to the matching color or a response to the nonmatching color was correct. Following training under this paradigm, stimulus control gradients were obtained by varying the angularity of the lines. Orderly gradients of stimulus control were obtained and no bias toward or away from the physically identical comparison stimulus was observed. The data were interpreted as indicating that the pigeons acquired a discrimination for each specific stimulus configuration or a set of specific stimulus-response chains based on compound stimuli in which physical identity played no special role.

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812074      PMCID: PMC1332848          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  OPPOSED GENERALIZATION GRADIENTS BASED UPON CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION TRAINING.

Authors:  C A BONEAU; W K HONIG
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1964-07

2.  Symbolic matching by pigeons: rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations.

Authors:  D E Carter; D A Eckerman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Conditional discrimination learning in the pigeon.

Authors:  D G Born; M E Snow; E W Herbert
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral interactions and stimulus control during conditional discriminations.

Authors:  D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations by pigeons.

Authors:  L R Cohen; T A Looney; J H Brady; A F Aucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus control during conditional discrimination.

Authors:  M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminative control of "attention".

Authors:  E G Heinemann; S Chase; C Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Effects of sodium pentobarbital on complex operant discriminations.

Authors:  R Berryman; W W Cumming; J A Nevin; M E Jarvik
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1964-11-11
  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  S P Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Use of an ambiguous-sample procedure to establish a cue to forget in pigeons.

Authors:  D S Grant
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Relational and absolute stimulus learning by monkeys in a memory task.

Authors:  A A Wright; R G Cook; D F Kendrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations.

Authors:  K M Bush; M Sidman; T de Rose
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Acquisition of matching-to-sample performance in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys.

Authors:  I H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The formation of visual stimulus equivalences in children.

Authors:  R M Lazar; D Davis-Lang; L Sanchez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Tamo Nakamura; Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz; Kent D Bodily; Bradley R Sturz
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 8.  Structure learning in action.

Authors:  Daniel A Braun; Carsten Mehring; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.