Literature DB >> 5689414

Discriminative control of "attention".

E G Heinemann, S Chase, C Mandell.   

Abstract

Three pigeons were trained to discriminate between two tones differing in frequency in the presence of light of one color (A), and not to discriminate between the tones in the presence of light of another color (B). Generalization functions that were determined in the presence of light A showed control of behavior by the frequency of the tone; those determined in the presence of light B did not.

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5689414     DOI: 10.1126/science.160.3827.553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  8 in total

1.  A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The role of physical identity of the sample and correct comparison stimulus in matching-to-sample paradigms.

Authors:  A Santi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Reversing the course of forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White; Glenn S Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Authors:  Stephanie Gomes-Ng; Douglas Elliffe; Sarah Cowie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Stimulus control during conditional discrimination.

Authors:  M Yarczower
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Matching-to-sample performance is better analyzed in terms of a four-term contingency than in terms of a three-term contingency.

Authors:  Brent M Jones; Douglas M Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.