Literature DB >> 19236147

Abstract-concept learning carryover effects from the initial training set in pigeons (Columba livia).

Tamo Nakamura1, Anthony A Wright, Jeffrey S Katz, Kent D Bodily, Bradley R Sturz.   

Abstract

Three groups of pigeons were trained in a same/different task with 32, 64, or 1,024 color-picture stimuli. They were tested with novel transfer pictures. The training-testing cycle was repeated with training-set doublings. The 32-item group learned the same/different task as rapidly as a previous 8-item group and transferred better than the 8-item group at the 32-item training set. The 64- and 1,024-item groups learned the task only somewhat slower than other groups, but their transfer was better and equivalent to baseline performances. These results show that pigeons trained with small sets (e.g., 8 items) have carryover effects that hamper transfer when the training set is expanded. Without carryover effects (i.e., initial transfer from the 32- and 64-item groups), pigeons show the same degree of transfer as rhesus and capuchin monkeys at these same set sizes. This finding has implications for the general ability of abstract-concept learning across species with different neural architectures. Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236147      PMCID: PMC4259154          DOI: 10.1037/a0013126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  16 in total

1.  Successive two-item same-different discrimination and concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Robert G. Cook; Debbie M. Kelly; Jeffrey S. Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Schema induction in problem solving: a multidimensional analysis.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Lei Mo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Two-item same-different concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-01

7.  Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons.

Authors:  Kent D Bodily; Jeffrey S Katz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-01

8.  Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training.

Authors:  M E Young; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1997-04

9.  Acquisition and transfer of zero-delay matching.

Authors:  W W Cumming; R Berryman; L R Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-10

10.  A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts.

Authors:  Leonidas A A Doumas; John E Hummel; Catherine M Sandhofer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  5 in total

1.  Testing the translational-symmetry hypothesis of abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Domain is a moving target for relational learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Katz; Bradley R Sturz; Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Functional relationships for investigating cognitive processes.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Feature- versus rule-based generalization in rats, pigeons and humans.

Authors:  Elisa Maes; Guido De Filippo; Angus B Inkster; Stephen E G Lea; Jan De Houwer; Rudi D'Hooge; Tom Beckers; Andy J Wills
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus perform above chance in a "matching-to-sample" experiment.

Authors:  Mélisande Aellen; Ulrike E Siebeck; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.