Literature DB >> 8315365

Acquisition of matching-to-sample performance in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys.

I H Iversen1.   

Abstract

Steady and blinking white lights were projected on three nose keys arranged horizontally on one wall. The procedure was a conditional discrimination with a sample stimulus presented on the middle key and comparison stimuli on the side keys. Three rats acquired simultaneous "identity matching." Accuracy reached 80% in about 25 sessions and 90% or higher after about 50 sessions. Acquisition progressed through several stages of repeated errors, alteration between comparison keys from trial to trial, preference of specific keys or stimuli, and a gradual lengthening of strings of consecutive trials with correct responses. An analysis of the acquisition curves for individual trial configurations indicated that the matching-to-sample performance possibly consisted of separate discriminations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8315365      PMCID: PMC1322131          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Symbolic matching by pigeons: rate of learning complex discriminations predicted from simple discriminations.

Authors:  D E Carter; D A Eckerman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Three-configuration matching-to-sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  A C Kamil; R A Sacks
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations by pigeons.

Authors:  L R Cohen; T A Looney; J H Brady; A F Aucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  All-or-none-acquisition in matching-to-sample and a test of two models.

Authors:  H K Rodewald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  M R D'Amato; M Colombo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  I H Iversen; M Sidman; P Carrigan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Matching-to-sample and oddity-from-sample in goldfish.

Authors:  M Goldman; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Comparative effects of cholinergic drugs and lesions of nucleus basalis or fimbria-fornix on delayed matching in rats.

Authors:  S B Dunnett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Low dose scopolamine affects discriminability but not rate of forgetting in delayed conditional discrimination.

Authors:  R C Kirk; K G White; N McNaughton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Episodic long-term memory in the rat: effects of hippocampal stimulation.

Authors:  R A Bierley; R P Kesner; J M Novak
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  10 in total

1.  Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Tracy Peña; Raymond C Pitts; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Successive odor matching- and non-matching-to-sample in rats: A reversal design.

Authors:  Katherine Bruce; Katherine Dyer; Michael Mathews; Catharine Nealley; Tiffany Phasukkan; Ashley Prichard; Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Matching- and nonmatching-to-sample concept learning in rats using olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  L Brooke April; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Cognitive abilities in Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): matching-to-sample and image/mirror-image discriminations.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Olfactory Stimulus Control and the Behavioral Pharmacology of Remembering.

Authors:  Mark Galizio
Journal:  Behav Anal (Wash D C)       Date:  2016-03-17

6.  Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats.

Authors:  Ashley Prichard; Danielle Panoz-Brown; Katherine Bruce; Mark Galizio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Dissociating the effects of delay and interference on dog (Canis familiaris) working memory.

Authors:  Sarah Krichbaum; Lucia Lazarowski; Adam Davila; Emma Cox; Jordan G Smith; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Simple and conditional visual discrimination with wheel running as reinforcement in rats.

Authors:  I H Iversen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no-go procedure.

Authors:  Paula Debert; Maria Amelia Matos; William McIlvane
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus perform above chance in a "matching-to-sample" experiment.

Authors:  Mélisande Aellen; Ulrike E Siebeck; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.