Literature DB >> 16812015

A molecular analysis of multiple schedule interactions: negative contrast.

H Marcucella, J S Macdonall.   

Abstract

The present experiments investigated the relationship between changes in the relative reinforced interresponse-time distributions and the occurrence of positive and negative contrast in multiple variable-interval-variable-interval and multiple variable-interval-extinction schedules of reinforcement. Experiment I demonstrated that changes in the interresponse-time distributions were consistently correlated with response-rate changes referred to as positive and negative contrast. Corresponding changes in the reinforced interresponse-time distributions suggested that negative contrast resulted as an inductive effect of selectively reinforcing long interresponse times in the altered component at the moment the baseline schedule was reintroduced. Experiment II demonstrated that the magnitude of the negative-contrast effect could be significantly decreased if the altered component schedule was modified in order to prevent the reinforcement of these interresponse times during the first few sessions of baseline recovery. The results supported a proposal that interresponse time-reinforcer relations may act as amplifiers or attenuators of negative contrast.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16812015      PMCID: PMC1333615          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

4.  Positive interaction (induction) in multiple variable-interval, differential-reinforcement-of-high-rate schedules.

Authors:  N S Hemmes; D A Eckerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules.

Authors:  J J Pear; D M Wilkie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminative stimulus location as a determinant of positive and negative behavioral contrast in the pigeon.

Authors:  B Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A computer-compatible digital encoding-decoding system.

Authors:  D I Mostofsky; S A Cohen; J Babish
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Behavioral contrast and the peak shift: effects of extended discrimination training.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral contrast and relative reinforcement frequency in two multiple schedules.

Authors:  T M Bloomfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Feedback functions for variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Nevin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Interresponse-time analysis of stimulus control in multiple schedules.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast and the automaintained key peck.

Authors:  R K Wesp; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Access conditions affect binge-type shortening consumption in rats.

Authors:  F H E Wojnicki; D S Johnson; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-09-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.