Literature DB >> 16811521

Contrast and stimulus generalization following prolonged discrimination training.

E Hearst.   

Abstract

Different groups of pigeons received discrimination training in which the reinforcement-associated and extinction-associated stimuli were respectively either (a) a line tilt vs a blank key, (b) a blank key vs a line tilt, or (c) two different line tilts. The high response rates that developed to the positive stimulus in all groups during discrimination learning were maintained over 64 sessions of training. After these sessions, all subjects were tested for stimulus generalization along the line-tilt dimension. Gradients of relative (per cent) generalization around the stimulus associated with reinforcement (so-called excitatory gradients) and around the stimulus associated with extinction (so-called inhibitory gradients) were as steep as they typically are after much briefer training periods. These results do not support several of Terrace's predictions on the basis of the hypothesis that emotional responses develop to the stimulus associated with extinction during discrimination learning with errors, but eventually dissipate after extended training.

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811521      PMCID: PMC1333847          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Generalization gradients of inhibition after different amounts of training.

Authors:  G W Farthing; E Hearst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Aversive properties of the negative stimulus in a successive discrimination.

Authors:  M Rilling; H R Askew; J E Ahlskog; T J Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrimination learning as the summation of excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  E Hearst
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Stimulus generalization and amount of prior training on variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  E Hearst; M B Koresko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

7.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  J A Deutsch; H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Behavioral contrast and the peak shift: effects of extended discrimination training.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Discrimination learning and inhibition.

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-30       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Temporal dynamics of generalization and representational distortion.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

2.  Peak shift following simultaneous discriminations.

Authors:  A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Discriminated response and incentive processes in operant conditioning: a two-factor model of stimulus control.

Authors:  S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral contrast and inhibitory stimulus control as related to extended training.

Authors:  W Selekman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Incentive processes and the peak shift.

Authors:  S J Weiss; R J Dacanay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effect of overtraining on behavioral contrast and the peak-shift.

Authors:  A Dukhayyil; J E Lyons
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing.

Authors:  F K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A molecular analysis of multiple schedule interactions: negative contrast.

Authors:  H Marcucella; J S Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Successive discrimination training with equated reinforcement frequencies: failure to obtain behavioral contrast.

Authors:  R A Boakes; M S Halliday; J S Mole
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.