Literature DB >> 16811953

Integrated delays to shock as negative reinforcement.

P Lewis, E T Gardner, L Hutton.   

Abstract

Rats were shocked at the rate of two per minute until they pressed a lever. In Experiment I, shocks were delivered at variable-time intervals averaging 30 sec; in Experiment II, shocks were delivered at fixed-time intervals of 30 sec. A response produced an alternate condition for a fixed-time period. The shock frequency following a response, calculated over the whole alternate condition, was two per minute. The pattern of shocks in the alternate condition was controlled so that the first shock occurred at the same time as it would have occurred had the response not been emitted; the remaining shocks were delayed until near the end of the alternate condition. Bar pressing was acquired in both experiments. This finding is not explained by two-factor theories of avoidance and is inconsistent with the notion that overall shock-frequency reduction is necessary for negative reinforcement. The data imply that responding is determined by the integrated delays to each shock following a response versus the integrated delays to shock in the absence of a response.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811953      PMCID: PMC1333528          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  13 in total

1.  PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE ACQUISITION OF SIDMAN AVOIDANCE.

Authors:  R C BOLLES; R J POPP
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Persistent shock-elicited responding engendered by a negative-reinforcement procedure.

Authors:  R W Powell; S Peck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 9.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla; R L Solomon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Remote effects of aversive contingencies: Disruption of appetitive behavior by adjacent avoidance sessions.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Delay or rate of food delivery as determiners of response rate.

Authors:  R L Shull; D J Spear; A E Bryson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Aversive control: A separate domain?

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; D J Neunaber
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.