Literature DB >> 16811473

Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

P N Hineline.   

Abstract

Stable lever-press responding in rats was reliably produced and maintained by a procedure in which responses could delay shocks without affecting overall shock frequency. Responding was not maintained when the delay-of-shock involved an increase in overall shock frequency.

Entities:  

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811473      PMCID: PMC1333732          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-08

3.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A rapid retractable response lever.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Attack, avoidance, and escape reactions to aversive shock.

Authors:  N H Azrin; R R Hutchinson; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Method and theory in the study of avoidance.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla; R L Solomon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

9.  Does CS termination reinforce avoidance behavior?

Authors:  R C Bolles; L W Stokes; M S Younger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10

10.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Responding in the squirrel monkey under fixed-ratio schedules of stimulus termination.

Authors:  L D Byrd
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Avoidance conditioning with shock contingent upon the avoidance response.

Authors:  J V Lambert; P J Bersh; P N Hineline; G D Smith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Negative reinforcement with shock-frequency increase.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Integrated delays to shock as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  P Lewis; E T Gardner; L Hutton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Responding maintained under intermittent schedules of electric-shock presentation: "Safety" or schedule effects?

Authors:  E F Malagodi; M L Gardner; S E Ward; R L Magyar
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.