Literature DB >> 14176280

PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE ACQUISITION OF SIDMAN AVOIDANCE.

R C BOLLES, R J POPP.   

Abstract

Four studies were conducted to investigate the source of reinforcement of Sidman avoidance. First it was found that the acquisition of avoidance was seriously impaired if there was no immediate stimulus consequence of responding, i.e., proprioceptive and auditory feedback. The second study showed that if the shock-shock interval was split so that only responses occurring in one half of the interval were effective in postponing shock, then learning was impaired. It made little difference which half of the interval was used. The third study demonstrated that Ss learn Sidman avoidance more quickly with a variable shock-shock interval than with the usual fixed-interval procedure. The results of the second and third experiments argue against the view that avoidance is reinforced by the decrease in conditioned aversiveness that occurs at long post-shock times. The final experiment indicated that Ss do not learn Sidman avoidance if the response-produced delay of shock is preceded by a shock, hence it seems unlikely that the crucial source of reinforcement is merely an overall reduction in shock density. All of the findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the avoidance response is reinforced by the decrease in conditioned aversiveness of stimuli at short post-response times. This seems to be the case even at the beginning of acquisition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AVOIDANCE LEARNING; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDY; RATS; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)

Mesh:

Year:  1964        PMID: 14176280      PMCID: PMC1404254          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  How are intertrial avoidance responses reinforced?

Authors:  O H MOWRER; J D KEEHN
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The effects of termination of the CS and avoidance of the US on avoidance learning.

Authors:  L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-08

5.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sidman instrumental avoidance initially depends on lateral and basal amygdala and is constrained by central amygdala-mediated Pavlovian processes.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Joseph E LeDoux; Christopher K Cain
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Bar press and bar release as avoidance responses.

Authors:  D Meltzer; J E Tiller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice of a terminating over a non-terminating signal in free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  S Culbertson; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A shaping technique for producing rapid and reliable Sidman bar-press avoidance.

Authors:  D Riess
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Escape, avoidance, punishment: where do we stand?

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Integrated delays to shock as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  P Lewis; E T Gardner; L Hutton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A response-spacing effect: an absence of responding during response-feedback stimuli.

Authors:  D F Hake; N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Behavioral engineering: control of posture by informational feedback.

Authors:  F O'brien; N H Azrin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1970
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.