Literature DB >> 16812486

Remote effects of aversive contingencies: Disruption of appetitive behavior by adjacent avoidance sessions.

T D Hackenberg, P N Hineline.   

Abstract

Disruption of ongoing appetitive behavior before and after daily avoidance sessions was examined. After baselines of appetitive responding were established under a fixed-interval 180-s schedule of food presentation, 4 rats were exposed to 40-min sessions of the appetitive schedule just prior to 100-min sessions of electric shock postponement, while another 4 rats received the 40-min appetitive sessions just following daily sessions of shock postponement. In all 8 subjects, fixed-interval response rates decreased relative to baseline levels, the effect being somewhat more pronounced when the avoidance sessions immediately followed. The disruption of fixed-interval responding was only partially reversed when avoidance sessions were discontinued. During the initial exposure to the avoidance sessions, patterns of responding under the fixed-interval schedule were differentially sensitive to disruption, with high baseline response rates generally more disturbed than low rates. These disruptions were not systematically related to changes in reinforcement frequency, which remained fairly high and invariant across all conditions of the experiment; they were also not systematically related to the response rates or to the shock rates of the adjacent avoidance sessions. The results, while qualitatively resembling patterns of conditioned suppression as typically studied, occurred on a greatly expanded time scale. As disruption of behavior extending over time, the present data suggest that some forms of conditioned suppression are perhaps best viewed within a larger temporal context.

Entities:  

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812486      PMCID: PMC1338750          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.

Authors:  Z ANNAU; L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

2.  A comparison of two types of warning stimulus in an avoidance situation.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; J J BOREN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1957-06

3.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Integrated delays to shock as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  P Lewis; E T Gardner; L Hutton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Warmup in avoidance as a function of time since prior training.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Conditioned suppression under positive, negative, and no contingency between conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  H Davis; R W McIntire
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Autocontingencies: Suppressive and accelerative effects of pairs of shocks superimposed on a positively reinforced operant baseline.

Authors:  H Davis; J Memmott
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Relative durations of conditioned stimulus and intertrial interval in conditioned suppression.

Authors:  D A Coleman; N S Hemmes; B L Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.