Literature DB >> 16812232

Trace autoshaping: Acquisition, maintenance, and path dependence at long trace intervals.

G A Lucas, J D Deich, E A Wasserman.   

Abstract

The pigeon's tendency to acquire and maintain signal-directed key pecking under a trace conditioning procedure was parametrically examined. In Experiment 1, the percentage of CS trials with a key peck response was a decreasing function of the trace interval for separate groups of pigeons. The majority of subjects acquired signal-directed key pecking with trace intervals as long as 36 sec. In Experiment 2, differential maintenance of key pecking occurred across trace intervals in a within-subject procedure. Maintenance of key pecking at 36- and 60-sec trace intervals was path dependent in that responding depended on the subject's performance under the preceding trace interval.

Entities:  

Year:  1981        PMID: 16812232      PMCID: PMC1333053          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS.

Authors:  J E STADDON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Autoshaping as a function of prior food presentations.

Authors:  K Downing; A Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Acquisition of the autoshaped key peck as a function of amount of preliminary magazine training.

Authors:  G D Steinhauer; G H Davol; A Lee
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Temporal factors influencing the pigeon's successive matching-to-sample performance: sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval.

Authors:  K R Nelson; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A comparison of pecking generated by serial, delay, and trace autoshaping procedures.

Authors:  R J Newlin; V M Lolordo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Contingency spaces and measures in classical and instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  J Gibbon; R Berryman; R L Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  11 in total

1.  Pigeons may not remember the stimuli that reinforced their recent behavior.

Authors:  D W Schaal; A L Odum; T A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.

Authors:  D W Schaal; K J Schuh; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The autoshaping procedure as a residual block clock.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; J D Dougan; J Pfister; E Thiels
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration.

Authors:  D W Schaal; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Stimulus control in fixed interfood intervals.

Authors:  William L Palya; Matthew T Bowers
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Mind the gap: olfactory trace conditioning in honeybees.

Authors:  Paul Szyszka; Christiane Demmler; Mariann Oemisch; Ludwig Sommer; Stephanie Biergans; Benjamin Birnbach; Ana F Silbering; C Giovanni Galizia
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Modulation of Operant Variation by the Probability, Magnitude, and Delay of Reinforcement.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2011-08-01

9.  Relative temporal representations in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Michele Wan; Mamadou Djourthe; Kathleen M Taylor; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Trace conditioning in insects-keep the trace!

Authors:  Kristina V Dylla; Dana S Galili; Paul Szyszka; Alja Lüdke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.