Literature DB >> 16811893

Negative reinforcement with shock-frequency increase.

E T Gardner, P Lewis.   

Abstract

Two avoidance-conditioning experiments in which responding delayed shocks are reported. Rats receiving an average of two shocks per minute (imposed condition) could produce, by pressing a bar, a 3-min alternate condition. Six (Experiment I) or more (Experiment II) shocks occurred in the alternate condition. All shocks in the alternate condition were delayed and delivered at 1-sec intervals. With long delays, all subjects produced the alternate condition and spent a large percentage of each session in the alternate condition. The first experiment demonstrated that the longer the delay from onset of the alternate condition to onset of the shocks, the more session time spent in the alternate condition. The second experiment indicated that despite increased shock frequency, behavior is acquired and maintained when responding leads to sufficient delay. Individual subjects produced the alternate condition by bar pressing in essentially one of two patterns. One pattern, termed postshock, involved bar pressing immediately after shock; the other, termed posttransition, involved responding immediately after the transition from the alternate to the imposed condition. These results indicate that shock-frequency reduction is not necessary for avoidance conditioning; delay to shock onset is sufficient.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811893      PMCID: PMC1333410          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Avoidance conditioning with shock contingent upon the avoidance response.

Authors:  J V Lambert; P J Bersh; P N Hineline; G D Smith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla; R L Solomon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; R L Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Duration-reduction of avoidance sessions as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  M Mellitz; P N Hineline; W G Whitehouse; M T Laurence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Integrated delays to shock as negative reinforcement.

Authors:  P Lewis; E T Gardner; L Hutton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Aversive control: A separate domain?

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity.

Authors:  E A Wasserman; D J Neunaber
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reducing self-injury and corresponding self-restraint through the strategic use of protective clothing.

Authors:  K Silverman; K Watanabe; A M Marshall; D M Baer
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.