Literature DB >> 4624511

Characteristics and response-displacement effects of shock-generated responding during negative reinforcement procedures: pre-shock responding and post-shock aggressive responding.

D F Hake, R L Campbell.   

Abstract

Bar-pressing (Experiment I) or key-pressing (Experiments II and III) responses of monkeys were reinforced according to a fixed-interval schedule of negative reinforcement: the first response after a fixed interval of time terminated regularly spaced shocks for a fixed time designated as the reinforcement period. During extinction, shocks continued during the reinforcement period. That there were two types of responding generated by shock alone was indicated by (1) the level of responding maintained during extinction relative to conditions without shock, (2) the stability of two between-shock response patterns across reinforcement and extinction conditions, and (3) the development of these two between-shock patterns without a history of reinforcement. Subjects developed either a pre-shock or a post-shock response pattern when only the bar was available. However, when both a bite tube, an operandum requiring an aggressive topography, and a recessed key, an operandum that did not require an aggressive topography, were provided, the post-shock pattern was observed in tube biting and the pre-shock pattern was observed in key pressing. Removal of the bite tube produced post-shock key responding similar to that observed when only the bar was available. The displacement of post-shock, aggression-motivated responding confirmed the confounding effect of shock-generated responding in negative reinforcement procedures, and suggests that the use of concurrent response alternatives would reduce such confounding.

Mesh:

Year:  1972        PMID: 4624511      PMCID: PMC1333907          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  25 in total

1.  PAIN-INDUCED FIGHTING IN THE SQUIRREL MONKEY.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; R R HUTCHINSON; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Fixed-interval schedules of electric shock presentation: extinction and recovery of performance under different shock intensities and fixed-interval durations.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Positive conditioned suppression: conditioned suppression using positive reinforcers as the unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  N H Azrin; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An automatic method for the study of aggression in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R R Hutchinson; N H Azrin; D F Hake
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement.

Authors:  D R Williams; H Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Modulation of elicited behavior by a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  W H Morse; R N Mead; R T Kelleher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock-presentation.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck.

Authors:  P L Brown; H M Jenkins
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditioned suppression and conditioned enhancement with the same positive UCS: an effect of CS duration.

Authors:  D Meltzer; J A Brahlek
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Frequency of reinforcement as a determinant of extinction-induced aggression during errorless discrimination learning.

Authors:  M Rilling; H J Caplan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The discriminative control of free-operant avoidance despite exposure to shock during the stimulus correlated with nonreinforcement.

Authors:  P J Bersh; J V Lambert
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Negative reinforcement with shock-frequency increase.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Lever attacking and pressing as a function of conditioning and extinguishing a lever-press avoidance response in rats.

Authors:  J J Pear; M J Hemingway; P Keizer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Response-shock delay as a reinforcer in avoidance behavior.

Authors:  J O Benedict
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Operant and nonoperant vocal responding in the mynah: Complex schedule control and deprivation-induced responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; J Mabry
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Brief exposure to contingent reinforcement produces a sustained increment in the strength of an elicited response.

Authors:  R R Hutchinson; G S Emley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Some relations between classically conditioned aggression and conditioned suppression in squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  D F Hake; R L Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.