Literature DB >> 16811694

Choice of higher density signalled shock over lower density unsignalled shock.

P Badia, C Coker, J Harsh.   

Abstract

Unsignalled, inescapable shocks were presented to four albino rats in Experiment 1. By pressing a lever subjects could change the condition to signalled shock for 3-min periods after which unsignalled shock was automatically reinstated. All subjects changed from unsignalled to signalled shock when shock density was the same or when the density of signalled shock was two times greater than unsignalled shock. When the density of signalled shock was four times that of unsignalled shock, three subjects changed to the higher density schedule. One subject changed to a density of signalled shock eight times that of unsignalled shock. The second study showed that the two shock schedules most similar in Experiment 1 were discriminably different because subjects chose lower over higher shock densities when both densities were unsignalled. An analysis stressing safe (signal absent) and unsafe (signal present) periods was discussed.

Entities:  

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811694      PMCID: PMC1334101          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.

Authors:  C C PERKINS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice of longer or stronger signalled shock over shorter or weaker unsignalled shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Negative reinforcement without shock reduction.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The course of Pavlovian excitation and inhibition of fear in rats.

Authors:  R G Weisman; J S Litner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-12

6.  Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-08

7.  Role of the intertrial interval in Pavlovian differential conditioning of fear in rats.

Authors:  R G Weisman; J S Litner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1971-02

8.  Conditioned inhibition of fear resulting from negative CS-US contingencies.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-04

9.  Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock.

Authors:  M E Seligman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-10

10.  Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  10 in total

1.  Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A temporal parameter influencing choice between signalled and unsignalled shock schedules.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects on responding of mixed and multiple schedules of signalled and unsignalled response-dependent electric-shock delivery.

Authors:  N Hymowitz
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The double-alternative, double-start experimental apparatus: A new procedure for measuring preference.

Authors:  G B Biederman; J J Furedy; G A Heighington
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for signaled over unsignaled shock schedules: Ruling out asymmetry and response fixation as factors.

Authors:  B B Abbott; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and the dependability of stimuli that predict shock and safety.

Authors:  P Badia; J Harsh; C C Coker; B Abbott
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice for signaled over unsignaled shock as a function of signal length.

Authors:  B Abbott; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the effectiveness of and preference for punishment and extinction components of function-based interventions.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Cathleen C Piazza; Wayne W Fisher; Kristen A Maglieri
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

10.  Sleeping through anything: The effects of unpredictable disruptions on mouse sleep, healing, and affect.

Authors:  Amy Robinson-Junker; Bruce O'Hara; Abigail Durkes; Brianna Gaskill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.