Literature DB >> 16811311

The effects of punishment intensity on squirrel monkeys.

D F Hake, N H Azrin, R Oxford.   

Abstract

Responses of squirrel monkeys were maintained by a variable-interval schedule of food reinforcement. Concurrently, punishment consisting of a brief electric shock followed each response. As has been found for pigeons and rats, punishment did not produce extreme, all-or-none reactions. By gradually increasing the punishment intensity it was possible to produce response rates intermediate to no suppression and complete suppression. Similarly, the moment-to-moment response rate was free of extreme fluctuations. A "warm-up" effect occurred in which the punished responses were especially suppressed during the initial part of a session. The pre-punishment performance was negatively accelerated within a session, and punishment reduced the degree of negative acceleration. When punishment was discontinued, responding recovered immediately except when suppression had been complete or prolonged. When the punishment intensity was decreased gradually, more suppression resulted at a given intensity than when intensity was increased gradually. This suggests a "behavioral inertia" effect wherein behavior at a new punishment intensity is biased toward the behavior at the previous value. A corollary generalization is that the larger the change in intensity, the less the behavior at the new value will be biased toward the behavior at the previous value.

Entities:  

Year:  1967        PMID: 16811311      PMCID: PMC1338325          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT AS A FUNCTION OF STRAIN OF RAT AND DURATION OF SHOCK.

Authors:  L H STORMS; G BOROCZI; W E BROEN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1963-12

2.  PUNISHMENT: EFFECTS OF SHOCK INTENSITY ON RESPONSE SUPPRESSION.

Authors:  J B APPEL; N J PETERSON
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1965-06

3.  An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs.

Authors:  D F HAKE; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Intermittent reinforcement by removal of a conditioned aversive stimulus.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D HAKE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-06-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Commercial liquid diet for animals in behavioral studies.

Authors:  T ELLISON; W C RIDDLE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Discriminated bar-press avoidance.

Authors:  H S HOFFMAN; M FLESHLER; H CHORNY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A mathematical index of performance on fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  W FRY; R T KELLEHER; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. I. Multiple fixed-ratio and fixed-interval termination of schedule complexes.

Authors:  W H Morse; R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Punishment contras during free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; M A Griffin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Escape and avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  P N Hineline; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A choice technique to assess the effects of selective punishment on fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Warmup in avoidance as a function of time since prior training.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effect of punishment shock intensity upon responding under multiple schedules.

Authors:  R W Powell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Punishment: the interactive effects of delay and intensity of shock.

Authors:  P S Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Intermittent punishment of human responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement.

Authors:  S R Scobie; A Kaufman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Fixed-interval punishment.

Authors:  J B Appel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.