Literature DB >> 16811831

Time allocation in human vigilance.

W M Baum.   

Abstract

Three human subjects detected unpredictable signals by pressing either of two telegraph keys. The relative frequencies with which detections occurred for the two alternatives were varied. The procedure included a changeover delay and response cost for letting go of a key. All subjects matched the relative time spent holding each key to the relative number of detections for that key, in conformity with the matching law. One subject's performance, which at first deviated from the relation, came into conformity with it when response cost was increased. Another subject's performance approximated matching more closely when the changeover delay was increased. The results confirm and extend the notions that choice consists in time allocation and that all behavior can be measured on the common scale of time.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811831      PMCID: PMC1333318          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for qualitatively different reinforcers.

Authors:  V Hollard; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  An analysis of response and time matching to reinforcement in concurrent ratio-interval schedules.

Authors:  C E Labounty; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer.

Authors:  E Fantino; N Squires; N Delbrück; C Peterson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Concurrent schedules of response-independent reinforcement: duration of a reinforcing stimulus.

Authors:  A J Brownstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Formal properties of the matching law.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Time allocation and negative reinforcement.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  33 in total

1.  The general matching law describes choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules of wheel-running reinforcement.

Authors:  T W Belke; J Belliveau
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.

Authors:  A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Laboratory lore and research practices in the experimental analysis of human behavior: Selecting reinforcers and arranging contingencies.

Authors:  M Galizio; W Buskist
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1988

4.  Observing behavior in a computer game.

Authors:  D A Case; B O Ploog; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.

Authors:  Carrie S W Borrero; Timothy R Vollmer; John C Borrero; Jason C Bourret; Kimberly N Sloman; Andrew L Samaha; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Practical implications of the matching law.

Authors:  J Myerson; S Hale
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1984

7.  Limited matching on concurrent-schedule reinforcement of academic behavior.

Authors:  F C Mace; N A Neef
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1994

8.  Performance on variable-interval schedules arranged singly and concurrently.

Authors:  M C Davison; I W Hunter
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Response and time allocation in concurrent second-order schedules.

Authors:  P G Beautrais; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules.

Authors:  R Taylor; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.