Literature DB >> 16811921

Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of unequal initial links.

M C Davison.   

Abstract

Six homing pigeons were trained on concurrent chain schedules in which the terminal links were fixed-interval schedules of 5 sec or 15 sec. One initial-link schedule was always VI 27-sec; the other was varied over conditions from VI 27-sec to VI 181-sec. Preference measured in the initial links varied as a joint function of the initial- and terminal-link schedules. When the initial links were varied with constant, but unequal, terminal links, the slope of the function relating the logarithm of the initial-link response ratio to the logarithm of the terminal-link entry ratio differed from that obtained with equal terminal links. This result indicates that biases attributable to the terminal-link schedules were not constant. The rate of change of preference, or degree of undermatching, in the initial links depended on whether the shorter initial link led to the shorter or the longer terminal link. These results raise the question of whether bias and undermatching in concurrent schedule performance are independent measures.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811921      PMCID: PMC1333476          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  19 in total

1.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule.

Authors:  M C Davison; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Performance in concurrent interval schedules: a systematic replication.

Authors:  B Lobb; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules: effects of initial-link length.

Authors:  G R Wardlaw; M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Temporal context in concurrent chains: I. Terminal-link duration.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Independence of terminal-link entry rate and immediacy in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Mark E Berg; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R Demello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  A contextual model of concurrent-chains choice.

Authors:  R C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Cued and uncued terminal links in concurrent-chains schedules.

Authors:  B Alsop; K E Stewart; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A decision model for steady-state choice in concurrent chains.

Authors:  Darren R Christensen; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.