Literature DB >> 14013456

Aversive aspects of a schedule of positive reinforcement.

J B APPEL.   

Abstract

Six male White Carneaux pigeons were trained to peck at one of two keys to obtain food on several fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Concurrently, the first response on a second key could, I-change the conditions of visual stimulation and remove the food reinforcement contingency, II-change the conditions of stimulation and have no effect upon the reinforcement contingency, or III-do nothing. The second response on the stimulus change key always restored baseline conditions. When second-key responses produced a stimulus change, the number of such responses was a function of the ratio value on the first key. Typically, second-key responses occurred before the start of fixed-ratio runs. The duration of stimulus change periods was an exponential function of the number of responses required for reinforcement when the possibility for reinforcement was not disturbed by periods of stimulus change (Condition II).

Keywords:  REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Mesh:

Year:  1963        PMID: 14013456      PMCID: PMC1404460          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  4 in total

1.  Time-out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The functional properties of a time out from an avoidance schedule.

Authors:  T VERHAVE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Punishment of S delta responding in matching to sample by time out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER; J B APPEL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Withdrawal of positive reinforcement as punishment.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

  4 in total
  38 in total

1.  Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.

Authors:  C J Pietras; T D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SOME NOTES ON TIME OUT FROM REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J ZIMMERMAN; C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  D M THOMPSON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES IN A MIXED FI-FR SCHEDULE.

Authors:  S B KENDALL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The sunk cost effect with pigeons: some determinants of decisions about persistence.

Authors:  Anne C Macaskill; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Shock as punishment in a picture-naming task with retarded children.

Authors:  A S Kircher; J J Pear; G L Martin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1971

7.  Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: competition requires more responding.

Authors:  D F Hake; D Olvera; J C Bell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Timeout as a reinforcer for errors in a serial position task.

Authors:  W H Redd; M Sidman; F G Fletcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Aversive aspects of a fixed-interval schedule of food reinforcement.

Authors:  R W Richards; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Self-imposed timeouts under increasing response requirements.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.