Literature DB >> 16811716

Effects of stimulus duration on observing behavior maintained by differential reinforcement magnitude.

R J Auge.   

Abstract

Pigeons made observing responses for stimuli signalling the availability of either 10-sec or 2-sec access to grain on fixed-interval 1-min schedules. If observing responses did not occur, food-producing responses occurred to a stimulus common to both reinforcement magnitudes. When the stimuli remained on for the duration of the components and signalled differential reinforcement magnitudes, observing responses were maintained; however, when the stimuli remained on for 10 sec, observing responses decreased markedly. In addition, it was shown that the occasional presentation of the stimulus signalling 10-sec access to grain was necessary for the maintenance of observing behavior. A control condition demonstrated that when all the available stimuli signalled 6-sec access to grain, observing responses declined. Taken together, the results demonstrated that the occasional presentation of the stimulus that remained on for the duration of the component and signalled the larger reinforcement magnitude was necessary for the maintenance of observing behavior.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811716      PMCID: PMC1334168          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  THE DISTRIBUTION OF OBSERVING RESPONSES IN A MIXED FI-FR SCHEDULE.

Authors:  S B KENDALL
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  S SHETTLEWORTH; J A NEVIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A review of positive conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; L R GOLLUB
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding.

Authors:  R E KEESEY; J W KLING
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Observing responses in pigeons.

Authors:  R T KELLEHER; W C RIDDLE; L COOK
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  The generality of selective observing.

Authors:  Scott T Gaynor; Richard L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Context, observing behavior, and conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  R J Auge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Authors:  E Fantino; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D E Mulvaney; A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Authors:  J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.

Authors:  K L Mueller; J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure.

Authors:  K L Mueller; J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.