Literature DB >> 6699539

Testing the reinforcing properties of S-: a replication of Lieberman's procedure.

K L Mueller, J A Dinsmoor.   

Abstract

A critical issue in testing theories of observing is whether the stimulus associated with extinction (the S-) reinforces observing responses. In previous experiments, subjects have been trained to make observing responses that produce both the S- and the stimulus correlated with reinforcement (the S+). Then, either the S+ or the S- has been withheld. Conflicting results have been attributed to differences among species. In the present experiments, pecking one key by master pigeons was reinforced with grain on a variable-ratio extinction schedule. Yoked pigeons received the grain on a variable-interval, extinction schedule controlled by the variable-ratio performances of the master birds. For both groups, concurrent pecking on a second key was reinforced on a variable-interval schedule with displays of discriminative stimuli. Subsequently, either the S+ or the S- was eliminated from the procedure. Omission of S+ produced a large decrease, as predicted by traditional conditioned reinforcement accounts of observing. By itself, S- did not maintain observing. A smaller and less reliable decrease, comparable to that obtained by Lieberman (1972) with rhesus monkeys, occurred when S- was eliminated. This replication with pigeons of Lieberman's results indicates that they are not species-specific, and the fact that observing was not maintained by S- alone suggests that the decrease obtained when S- was omitted is not attributable to the reinforcing power of S-.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699539      PMCID: PMC1347952          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

3.  The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.

Authors:  C C PERKINS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; M P Browne; C E Lawrence
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Punishment of observing by the negative discriminative stimulus.

Authors:  D E Mulvaney; J A Dinsmoor; A R Jwaideh; L H Hughes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response.

Authors:  H Rachlin; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of stimulus duration on observing behavior maintained by differential reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  R J Auge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; D E Mulvaney; A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort.

Authors:  M Perone; A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 10.  An analysis of the concept of reinforcement.

Authors:  C C Perkins
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  6 in total

1.  Observing responses and serial stimuli: searching for the reinforcing properties of the S-.

Authors:  Rogelio Escobar; Carlos A Bruner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Stimuli that signal the absence of reinforcement are paid more attention than are irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Jemma C Dopson; Natalie A Williams; Guillem R Esber; John M Pearce
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Conditioned reinforcement of human observing behavior by descriptive and arbitrary verbal stimuli.

Authors:  M Perone; B J Kaminski
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Information on response requirements compared with information on food density as a reinforcer of observing in pigeons.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor; C A Bowe; L Green; J Hanson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.

Authors:  K L Mueller; J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Conditioned reinforcement by conditional discriminative stimuli.

Authors:  A Ohta
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.