Literature DB >> 16811592

Probability learning as a function of momentary reinforcement probability.

B A Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a probability learning task where the overall reinforcement probability was 0.50 for each response alternative but where the momentary reinforcement probability differed and depended upon the outcome of the preceding trial. In all cases, the maximum reinforcement occurred with a "win-stay, lose-shift" response pattern. When both position and color were relevant cues, the optimal response pattern was learned when the reinforcement probability for repeating the just-reinforced response was 0.80 but not when the probability was 0.65. When only color was relevant, learning occurred much more slowly, and only for subjects trained on large fixed ratio requirements.

Year:  1972        PMID: 16811592      PMCID: PMC1333912          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  SUCCESSIVE DISCRIMINATION-REVERSAL TRAINING AND MULTIPLE DISCRIMINATION TRAINING IN ONE-TRIAL LEARNING BY CHIMPANZEES.

Authors:  R J SCHUSTERMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-08

2.  Probability-matching in the pigeon.

Authors:  D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-12

3.  FURTHER EXPERIMENTS ON PROBABILITY-MATCHING IN THE PIGEON.

Authors:  V GRAF; D H BULLOCK; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Intermittent reinforcement of matching to sample in the pigeon.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Intermittent Reinforcement of a Complex Response in a Chimpanzee.

Authors:  C B Ferster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reversal learning and the formation of learning sets by cats and rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  J M Warren
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-06

7.  Stimulus control with fixed-ratio reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: the previously reinforced response.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of random reinforcement sequences.

Authors:  M J Morgan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: delayed-pair-comparison procedures and some results.

Authors:  C P Shimp; M Moffitt
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Does effort play a role in the effect of response requirements on delayed matching to sample?

Authors:  M L Spetch; D Treit
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  On the failure and facilitation of conditional discrimination.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Jessica P Stagner; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Pigeons' use of cues in a repeated five-trial-sequence, single-reversal task.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.