Literature DB >> 16811352

Contiguity of briefly presented stimuli with food reinforcement.

A Stubbs.   

Abstract

Pigeons performed on second-order schedules of reinforcement consisting of four fixed-interval components. Only the terminal component ended with food. Performance was studied both when a brief stimulus followed the completion of each of the first three fixed intervals (brief-stimulus schedule) and when the stimulus was omitted (tandem schedule). Variations in the temporal contiguity of the last presentation of the stimulus and the presentation of food indicated that the shorter the delay, the greater was the enhancement of rate of responding in comparison with tandem performance. A positively accelerated pattern of responding within fixed-interval components was a function of the contiguity of the brief stimulus and reinforcement; this pattern was absent for all tandem-schedule performance.

Year:  1969        PMID: 16811352      PMCID: PMC1338557          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  FACILITATION OF LARGE RATIO PERFORMANCE BY USE OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Intermittent Reinforcement of Discriminatively Controlled Responses and Runs of Responses.

Authors:  D W Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses.

Authors:  P J BERSH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-01

5.  A temporal gradient of derived reinforcement.

Authors:  W O JENKINS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1950-04

6.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus control of temporally spaced responding in second-order schedules.

Authors:  J R Thomas; A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Fixed-interval behavior maintained by conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  J De Lorge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules.

Authors:  R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination performance.

Authors:  A Stubbs; W D Galloway
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Second-order schedules and the problem of conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Second-order schedules: brief shock at the completion of each component.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; P J Silverman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Second-order schedules: a comparison of chained, brief-stimulus, and tandem procedures.

Authors:  E F Malagodi; J Deweese; J M Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Rate changes after unscheduled omission and presentation of reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The effects of brief stimuli presented under a multiple schedule of second-order schedules.

Authors:  J De Lorge
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Second-order schedules: discrimination of components.

Authors:  N Squires; J Norborg; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.