Literature DB >> 16811789

Temporal inhibition: effects of changes in rate of reinforcement and rate of responding.

E G Carr, G S Reynolds.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to key peck on several multiple schedules in which the first of two components was always a simple fixed-interval schedule. The rate of responding at the beginning of the constant fixed-interval schedule was found to decrease with increases in the rate of reinforcement associated with the other component of the multiple schedule, but remained unchanged with decreases in the rate of responding associated with the other component. These results were interpreted as being consistent with the view that the presence and magnitude of the temporal inhibitory effects observed in a given fixed-interval schedule are a function of the properties of reinforcing stimuli, rather than of changes in the rate of responding associated with the time interval immediately preceding the fixed interval in question.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811789      PMCID: PMC1333243          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effect of reinforcement duration on fixed-interval responding.

Authors:  J E Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavior under extended exposure to a high-value fixed interval reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  W W Cumming; W N Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-08       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral aftereffects of reinforcement and its omission as a function of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  C Jensen; D Fallon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Rate changes after unscheduled omission and presentation of reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Behavioral contrast with fixed interval and low-rate reinforcement.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS; A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-10       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Ryan D Ward; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast in fixed-interval components: effects of extinction-component duration.

Authors:  J C de Rose
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.