Literature DB >> 5078089

Control of preference in children by conditioned positive reinforcement.

J E Favell, J E Favell.   

Abstract

A preference measure was employed with children to evaluate the conditioned positive reinforcing function of a stimulus that preceded reinforcement. A match-to-sample procedure was arranged in which subjects could respond to either the form or color dimension of a compound sample stimulus. Intermittent token reinforcement was provided equally for color and form matches. Two stimuli were employed (Stimulus A and Stimulus B), each consisting of a distinctive tone and colored light. One of these stimuli (the paired stimulus) preceded each token delivery, and the other did not (nonpaired stimulus). The paired stimulus was dependent upon each response to one match dimension, and the nonpaired stimulus followed each response to the other dimension. Three of the five subjects responded primarily to the dimension that was followed by the paired stimulus. This effect was obtained regardless of which stimulus (A or B) was paired and on which match dimension (color or form) the paired stimulus was dependent. These results were unaltered by discontinuing the nonpaired stimulus. The other two subjects demonstrated consistent preferences for the form dimension and Stimulus A, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1972        PMID: 5078089      PMCID: PMC1333988          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  TECHNIQUE FOR SUSTAINING BEHAVIOR WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  FACILITATION OF LARGE RATIO PERFORMANCE BY USE OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination performance.

Authors:  A Stubbs; W D Galloway
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of a conditioned reinforcer upon accuracy of match-to-sample behavior in pigeons.

Authors:  H B Clark; J A Sherman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sustaining behavior with conditioned reinforcement as the only response-produced consequence.

Authors:  J Zimmerman; P V Hanford
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1966-10

6.  Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules.

Authors:  R T Kelleher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.