Literature DB >> 16811428

A choice technique to assess the effects of selective punishment on fixed-ratio performance.

M C Davison.   

Abstract

The emission of a fixed number of responses by rats was followed by food reinforcement. This fixed number could be accumulated in any way from two continuously available but mutually incompatible response classes, bar pressing, and not bar pressing for a fixed time period. A preference for one response class was arranged by specifying different maximum reinforcement rates for the two classes. Under selective punishment conditions, the preferred response occasionally led to both food and electric shock, while the non-preferred response led only to food. Selective punishment effects were measured through changes in the preference to the two responses in the sequence. The actions of shock intensity, deprivation, the specification of the non-preferred response, and three drugs were investigated. The results were broadly similar to the work reported by Dardano and Sauerbrunn (1964), who found localized increases in interresponse times before punished responses in fixed-ratio schedules. Performance under this procedure was found to be stable and sensitive to each of the experimental variables examined.

Entities:  

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811428      PMCID: PMC1333656          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  PUNISHMENT BY NOISE IN AN ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SITUATION.

Authors:  R L HERMAN; N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF FIXED-RATIO PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  J F DARDANO; D SAUERBRUNN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of drugs on approachavoidance conflict tested repeatedly by means of a "telescope alley".

Authors:  H BARRY; N E MILLER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-04

5.  An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.

Authors:  J D FINDLEY
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  M SIDMAN; W C STEBBINS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1954-04

Review 8.  Experimental effects of amphetamine: a review.

Authors:  S O Cole
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Drug effects in squirrel monkeys trained on a multiple schedule with a punishment contingency.

Authors:  H M Hanson; J J Witoslawski; E H Campbell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effect of amobarbital and chlorpromazine on punished behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  W H Morse
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1964-10-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Control of concurrent avoidance and appetitive behaviors by an indicator of shock proximity.

Authors:  J F Dardano
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Reinforcing the absence of fixed-ratio performance.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of repeated exposure to escalating versus constant punishment intensity on response allocation.

Authors:  Rafaela M Fontes; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.215

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.