Literature DB >> 16811324

Punishment: the interactive effects of delay and intensity of shock.

P S Cohen.   

Abstract

A discrete-trial punishment procedure, with rats, was used to examine how delay-of-shock intervals of 0 to 28 sec and shock intensity interact to decrease the frequency and increase the latency of a positively reinforced response. For delay-of-shock intervals of 0, 7, 14, and 28 sec, there was a range of shock intensities, for some subjects, over which the punishing effect of shock was an increasing, monotonic function of shock intensity. For other subjects this transition was abrupt. Functions relating response frequency and latency measures to shock intensity were displaced toward higher values on the shock intensity axis with an increase in delay-of-shock interval. The effects of "gradual" and "abrupt" introduction to "severe" shock, as well as re-exposure to previously used shock intensities, were examined under both the immediate and delay-of-shock conditions. With delay-of-shock intervals of 7, 14, or 28 sec, shock intensities of approximately 0.50 milliamperes or greater were necessary to decrease substantially the number and increase the latency of the lever-pressing response. For the immediate punishment group this intensity was approximately 0.20 ma. These facts were related to Annau and Kamin's (1961) conditioned emotional response experiment in which a shock intensity of 0.49 ma or greater was required to suppress the rate of a positively reinforced response.

Entities:  

Year:  1968        PMID: 16811324      PMCID: PMC1338632          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Punishment and shock intensity.

Authors:  J B APPEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The conditioned emotional response as a function of intensity of the US.

Authors:  Z ANNAU; L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-08

3.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Learning resistance to pain and fear: effects of overlearning, exposure, and rewarded expsure in context.

Authors:  N E MILLER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-09

5.  The delay-of-punishment gradient.

Authors:  L J KAMIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

6.  Some effects of punishment and intercurrent anxiety on a simple operant.

Authors:  H F HUNT; J V BRADY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1955-08

7.  Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis.

Authors:  J A DINSMOOR
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning.

Authors:  H M Jenkins
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Temporal relationship between response and punishment.

Authors:  D S Camp; G A Raymond; R M Church
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-05

10.  Discriminated punishment: avoidable and unavoidable shock.

Authors:  J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing.

Authors:  J A Dinsmoor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Christina M Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

3.  Suppression of cocaine self-administration in monkeys: effects of delayed punishment.

Authors:  William L Woolverton; Kevin B Freeman; Joel Myerson; Leonard Green
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Responding maintained under fixed-interval and fixed-time schedules of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  E F Malagodi; M L Gardner; G Palermo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Variable shock-free times with informative and uniformative stimuli.

Authors:  L M Lewin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.

Authors:  William Rodríguez; Arturo Bouzas; Vladimir Orduña
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Effects of repeated exposure to escalating versus constant punishment intensity on response allocation.

Authors:  Rafaela M Fontes; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.215

8.  Behavioral assessment of pain detection and tolerance in monkeys.

Authors:  A A Manning; C J Vierck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-09-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.