Literature DB >> 16799710

Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Zsuzsanna Kahán1, Katalin Varga, Rita Dudás, Tibor Nyári, László Thurzó.   

Abstract

The information needs of breast cancer patients on their disease, its treatment, the prognosis, and their attitude to decision-making concerning treatment were assessed. One hundred and fifty early and 45 metastatic breast cancer patients were recruited into the study. The amount of information and role in the treatment decision-making process preferred by the patient were independently estimated by the patient and the oncologist, using questionnaires. Information was provided in accordance with the wishes of the patient as perceived by the physician. Test of anxiety was performed before, and one week after the consultation. Most of the patients claimed to anticipate the provision of extensive information and an active role in the decision-making, but real interest during the consultation was found less frequently. The post-consultation anxiety test revealed a significant decrease in situational anxiety; this was not related to the patient's information needs or her attitude to the decision-making concerning treatment. Our study demonstrates that a significant decrease in anxiety may be achieved via a consultation tailored to the needs of the patient. Loading the patient with information and involvement in the decision regarding therapy as much as the patient seems comfortable with lowers distress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799710     DOI: 10.1007/bf02893451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  36 in total

1.  Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Wenchi Liang; Caroline B Burnett; Julia H Rowland; Neal J Meropol; Lynne Eggert; Yi-Ting Hwang; Rebecca A Silliman; Jane C Weeks; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; G P Maguire; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

3.  Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life.

Authors:  S Molenaar; M A Sprangers; E J Rutgers; E J Luiten; J Mulder; P M Bossuyt; J J van Everdingen; P Oosterveld; H C de Haes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Communicating prognosis to patients with metastatic disease: what do they really want to know?

Authors:  P N Butow; S Dowsett; R Hagerty; M H N Tattersall
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Breast cancer patients' personality style, age, and treatment decision making.

Authors:  J D Johnson; C S Roberts; C E Cox; D S Reintgen; J S Levine; M Parsons
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Doctor-patient communication patterns in breast cancer adjuvant therapy discussions.

Authors:  Laura A. Siminoff; Peter Ravdin; Natalie Colabianchi; Christina M. Saunders Sturm
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Determinants of participation in treatment decision-making by older breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yoshiko Umezawa; Barbara Leake; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  IPOS Sutherland Memorial Lecture: an international perspective on the development of psychosocial oncology: overcoming cultural and attitudinal barriers to improve psychosocial care.

Authors:  Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: a randomised trial.

Authors:  R F Brown; P N Butow; S M Dunn; M H Tattersall
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  The impact of the perception of treatment choice on satisfaction with treatment, experienced chemotherapy burden and current quality of life.

Authors:  S J T Jansen; W Otten; C J H van de Velde; J W R Nortier; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

2.  Patients' choice on axillary lymph node dissection following sentinel lymph node micrometastasis--first report on prospective use of a nomogram in very low risk patients.

Authors:  Gábor Cserni; Istvánné Bezsenyi; László Markó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.201

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.