Literature DB >> 8944063

Breast cancer patients' personality style, age, and treatment decision making.

J D Johnson1, C S Roberts, C E Cox, D S Reintgen, J S Levine, M Parsons.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that whereas nearly all cancer patients want information, far fewer wish to make treatment decisions. Although breast cancer patients who were given a choice of lumpectomy versus mastectomy and were encouraged to make the decision were believed to do better psychologically, a 1994 study refuted this. Some authors suggest that patient personality style is an important consideration in decisional preference.
METHODS: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (n = 76) were surveyed within 6 months of surgery. They answered seven questions about patient and physician roles in the decision-making process. Additionally, they completed the Miller Behavioral Style Scale (MBSS), which categorizes "monitors," or information seekers, and "blunters," or information avoiders. Chi-square analyses were used to explore the relationship of personality style and age to treatment decision-making preferences.
RESULTS: Although 80% of women wanted a role in decision making, 74% wanted their surgeons to make a recommendation and when given, 94% followed the recommended treatment plan. Monitors and blunters were equally likely to want physician recommendations. Younger women, particularly those under age 40, were more likely to want a physician's recommendation. Of those women who had specific fears about their cancer (76%), only half of them revealed such fears to their doctors.
CONCLUSIONS: The notion that health care consumers, particularly younger ones, desire an independent choice of treatment was contradicted in this study. Physicians are encouraged to provide information and to probe regarding the fears of breast cancer patients in order to reduce anxiety while recognizing that treatment recommendations are desired by most women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8944063     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199611)63:3<183::AID-JSO9>3.0.CO;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

1.  Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahán; Katalin Varga; Rita Dudás; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Cindy B Matsen; Sarah Lyons; Melody S Goodman; Barbara B Biesecker; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-08-04

3.  Understanding surgery choices for breast cancer: how might the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Common Sense Model contribute to decision support interventions?

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Antony S R Manstead
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Factors Influencing Men's Interest in Gene Testing for Prostate Cancer Susceptibility.

Authors:  Duane D Culler; Judy Silberg; Lauren Vanner-Nicely; Joy L Ware; Colleen Jackson-Cook; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Midline anterior repair alone vs anterior repair plus vaginal paravaginal repair: a comparison of anatomic and quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Abraham N Morse; Katharine K O'dell; Allison E Howard; Stephen P Baker; Michael P Aronson; Stephen B Young
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-06

6.  Patient Preferences for Surgery or Antibiotics for the Treatment of Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Alexis L Hanson; Ross D Crosby; Marc D Basson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 7.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

8.  How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients' adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making?

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; S J T Jansen; W Otten; M C M Baas-Thijssen; H van Slooten; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Intentions for bilateral mastectomy among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Lesley King; Suzanne C O'Neill; Elizabeth Spellman; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Shawna Willey; Kara Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Rachel Nusbaum; Elizabeth Feldman; Lina Jandorf; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 10.  Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.

Authors:  Laura A Shinkunas; Caleb J Klipowicz; Erica M Carlisle
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.796

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.