Literature DB >> 11250997

Decision support for patients with early-stage breast cancer: effects of an interactive breast cancer CDROM on treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life.

S Molenaar1, M A Sprangers, E J Rutgers, E J Luiten, J Mulder, P M Bossuyt, J J van Everdingen, P Oosterveld, H C de Haes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM as a decision aid for breast cancer patients with a choice between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (MT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with stage I and II breast cancer were enrolled. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal, and pretest/posttest design was used. Follow-up was scheduled 3 and 9 months after discharge from the hospital. Control patients (n = 88) received standard care (oral information and brochures). The CDROM was provided to patients in the experimental condition (n = 92) as a supplement to standard procedures. Outcome variables were treatment decision, satisfaction, and quality of life (QoL).
RESULTS: No effect on treatment decision was found. CDROM patients expressed more general satisfaction with information at 3 and 9 months (95% confidence interval for the difference (d) between the means (d: 4.1 to 12.5 and 5.7 to 14.2 respectively). CDROM patients were also more satisfied with their treatment decision at 3 and at 9 months (d: 0.1 to 0.4; 0.2 to 0.5). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients were more satisfied with breast cancer-specific information (d: 0.9 to 16.5), the decision-making process (d: 0.1 to 0.4), and communication (d: 0.2 to 11.0). At 3 and 9 months, a positive effect was found on general health (d: 0.2 to 14.5 and 0.3 to 15.0). Moreover, at 9 months, CDROM patients reported better physical functioning (d: 5.1 to 19.8), less pain (d: -17.9 to -4.5), and fewer arm symptoms (d: -14.1 to -0.5).
CONCLUSION: The Interactive Breast Cancer CDROM improved decision making in patients with early-stage breast cancer with a choice between BCT and MT, as evaluated in terms of patients' satisfaction and QoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11250997     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  44 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative patient education for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Beth Aviva Preminger; Valerie Lemaine; Isabel Sulimanoff; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Longitudinal changes in patient distress following interactive decision aid use among BRCA1/2 carriers: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Clinton Finch; Erica Wahl; Jessica Rispoli Joines; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Estimating development cost for a tailored interactive computer program to enhance colorectal cancer screening compliance.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Judith L Bettencourt; Sally W Vernon; Anthony Greisinger
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Collaborative/active participation per se does not decrease anxiety in breast cancer.

Authors:  Zsuzsanna Kahán; Katalin Varga; Rita Dudás; Tibor Nyári; László Thurzó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  The role of patients in designing health information systems: the case of applying simulation techniques to design an electronic patient record (EPR) interface.

Authors:  Kevin J Leonard
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-11

6.  Evaluating a Decision Aid for Improving Decision Making in Patients with Early-stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Lisa Newman; Jennifer J Griggs; Mary Ann Kosir; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usual care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Barbara L Smith; Sara Frederick; Anna Mitarotondo; Deborah A Kashy; Laurie J Kirstein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Decisional support throughout the cancer journey for older women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer: a single institutional study.

Authors:  Roseanna Presutti; Laura D'Alimonte; Merrylee McGuffin; Hanbert Chen; Edward Chow; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Lisa Di Prospero; Mary Doherty; Alex Kiss; Jennifer Wong; Justin Lee; Stanley Liu; Ellen Warner; Maureen Trudeau; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Tamara Harth; Ewa Szumacher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients?

Authors:  Jennifer C Livaudais; Rebeca Franco; Kezhen Fei; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.